All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zero" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 09:07:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517472448240134@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e8a78250e8cf1f486b4cdb005e3ff313b992816.1517279268.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zero

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bpf-fix-32-bit-divide-by-zero.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Thu Feb  1 09:05:44 CET 2018
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:37:45 +0100
Subject: bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zero
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, stable@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <7e8a78250e8cf1f486b4cdb005e3ff313b992816.1517279268.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

[ upstream commit 68fda450a7df51cff9e5a4d4a4d9d0d5f2589153 ]

due to some JITs doing if (src_reg == 0) check in 64-bit mode
for div/mod operations mask upper 32-bits of src register
before doing the check

Fixes: 622582786c9e ("net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT")
Fixes: 7a12b5031c6b ("sparc64: Add eBPF JIT.")
Reported-by: syzbot+48340bb518e88849e2e3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 net/core/filter.c     |    4 ++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2248,6 +2248,24 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct verifi
 	int i, cnt, delta = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
+		if (insn->code == (BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X) ||
+		    insn->code == (BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X)) {
+			/* due to JIT bugs clear upper 32-bits of src register
+			 * before div/mod operation
+			 */
+			insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_REG(insn->src_reg, insn->src_reg);
+			insn_buf[1] = *insn;
+			cnt = 2;
+			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
+			if (!new_prog)
+				return -ENOMEM;
+
+			delta    += cnt - 1;
+			env->prog = prog = new_prog;
+			insn      = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL))
 			continue;
 
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -430,6 +430,10 @@ do_pass:
 			    convert_bpf_extensions(fp, &insn))
 				break;
 
+			if (fp->code == (BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X) ||
+			    fp->code == (BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X))
+				*insn++ = BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_X, BPF_REG_X);
+
 			*insn = BPF_RAW_INSN(fp->code, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_X, 0, fp->k);
 			break;
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daniel@iogearbox.net are

queue-4.4/bpf-fix-branch-pruning-logic.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-avoid-false-sharing-of-map-refcount-with-max_entries.patch
queue-4.4/x86-bpf_jit-small-optimization-in-emit_bpf_tail_call.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-reject-stores-into-ctx-via-st-and-xadd.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-fix-32-bit-divide-by-zero.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-fix-bpf_tail_call-x64-jit.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-arsh-is-not-supported-in-32-bit-alu-thus-reject-it.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-fix-divides-by-zero.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-introduce-bpf_jit_always_on-config.patch

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-01  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-30  2:37 [PATCH stable 4.4 0/9] BPF stable patches Daniel Borkmann
2018-01-30  2:37 ` [PATCH stable 4.4 1/9] bpf: fix branch pruning logic Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-01  8:07   ` Patch "bpf: fix branch pruning logic" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-30  2:37 ` [PATCH stable 4.4 2/9] x86: bpf_jit: small optimization in emit_bpf_tail_call() Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-01  8:07   ` Patch "x86: bpf_jit: small optimization in emit_bpf_tail_call()" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-30  2:37 ` [PATCH stable 4.4 3/9] bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-01  8:07   ` Patch "bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-30  2:37 ` [PATCH stable 4.4 4/9] bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-01  8:07   ` Patch "bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-30  2:37 ` [PATCH stable 4.4 5/9] bpf: arsh is not supported in 32 bit alu thus reject it Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-01  8:07   ` Patch "bpf: arsh is not supported in 32 bit alu thus reject it" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-30  2:37 ` [PATCH stable 4.4 6/9] bpf: avoid false sharing of map refcount with max_entries Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-01  8:07   ` Patch "bpf: avoid false sharing of map refcount with max_entries" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-30  2:37 ` [PATCH stable 4.4 7/9] bpf: fix divides by zero Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-01  8:07   ` Patch "bpf: fix divides by zero" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-30  2:37 ` [PATCH stable 4.4 8/9] bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zero Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-01  8:07   ` gregkh [this message]
2018-01-30  2:37 ` [PATCH stable 4.4 9/9] bpf: reject stores into ctx via st and xadd Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-01  8:07   ` Patch "bpf: reject stores into ctx via st and xadd" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-01-30  6:30 ` [PATCH stable 4.4 0/9] BPF stable patches Greg KH
2018-01-30 10:29   ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-01  8:07     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1517472448240134@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.