From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to pure ACPI driver Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 18:18:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1517847491.22495.36.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20180131182614.19524-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20180131213726.GB21498@fury> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:45986 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752925AbeBEQSP (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 11:18:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180131213726.GB21498@fury> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Darren Hart Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, AceLan Kao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, Mario Limonciello , Rafael Wysocki On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 13:37 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 08:26:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Remove code duplication by converting driver to pure ACPI one. > I have fixed couple issues, but... > +Rafael > > I don't see any reason *not* to do this, it seems the acpi driver > model provides > some of the boilerplate stuff we were doing manually before as a > platform > device. I'm scratching my head wondering why we did this as a > platform-driver in > the first place now... ...I still keep in my review queue in a hope that someone can actually test this on real hardware. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy