All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	keescook@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 09:38:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517852316157102@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     x86uaccess_Use___uaccess_begin_nospec()_and_uaccess_try_nospec.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


Subject: x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec
From: Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com
Date: Mon Jan 29 17:02:49 2018 -0800

From: Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com

commit 304ec1b050310548db33063e567123fae8fd0301

Quoting Linus:

    I do think that it would be a good idea to very expressly document
    the fact that it's not that the user access itself is unsafe. I do
    agree that things like "get_user()" want to be protected, but not
    because of any direct bugs or problems with get_user() and friends,
    but simply because get_user() is an excellent source of a pointer
    that is obviously controlled from a potentially attacking user
    space. So it's a prime candidate for then finding _subsequent_
    accesses that can then be used to perturb the cache.

__uaccess_begin_nospec() covers __get_user() and copy_from_iter() where the
limit check is far away from the user pointer de-reference. In those cases
a barrier_nospec() prevents speculation with a potential pointer to
privileged memory. uaccess_try_nospec covers get_user_try.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: alan@linux.intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727416953.33451.10508284228526170604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>


---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h    |    6 +++---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h |    6 +++---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h |   12 ++++++------
 arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c        |    4 ++--
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ do {									\
 ({									\
 	int __gu_err;							\
 	__inttype(*(ptr)) __gu_val;					\
-	__uaccess_begin();						\
+	__uaccess_begin_nospec();					\
 	__get_user_size(__gu_val, (ptr), (size), __gu_err, -EFAULT);	\
 	__uaccess_end();						\
 	(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val;			\
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ struct __large_struct { unsigned long bu
  *	get_user_ex(...);
  * } get_user_catch(err)
  */
-#define get_user_try		uaccess_try
+#define get_user_try		uaccess_try_nospec
 #define get_user_catch(err)	uaccess_catch(err)
 
 #define get_user_ex(x, ptr)	do {					\
@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ extern void __cmpxchg_wrong_size(void)
 	__typeof__(ptr) __uval = (uval);				\
 	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __old = (old);				\
 	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __new = (new);				\
-	__uaccess_begin();						\
+	__uaccess_begin_nospec();					\
 	switch (size) {							\
 	case 1:								\
 	{								\
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
@@ -29,21 +29,21 @@ raw_copy_from_user(void *to, const void
 		switch (n) {
 		case 1:
 			ret = 0;
-			__uaccess_begin();
+			__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 			__get_user_asm_nozero(*(u8 *)to, from, ret,
 					      "b", "b", "=q", 1);
 			__uaccess_end();
 			return ret;
 		case 2:
 			ret = 0;
-			__uaccess_begin();
+			__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 			__get_user_asm_nozero(*(u16 *)to, from, ret,
 					      "w", "w", "=r", 2);
 			__uaccess_end();
 			return ret;
 		case 4:
 			ret = 0;
-			__uaccess_begin();
+			__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 			__get_user_asm_nozero(*(u32 *)to, from, ret,
 					      "l", "k", "=r", 4);
 			__uaccess_end();
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -55,31 +55,31 @@ raw_copy_from_user(void *dst, const void
 		return copy_user_generic(dst, (__force void *)src, size);
 	switch (size) {
 	case 1:
-		__uaccess_begin();
+		__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 		__get_user_asm_nozero(*(u8 *)dst, (u8 __user *)src,
 			      ret, "b", "b", "=q", 1);
 		__uaccess_end();
 		return ret;
 	case 2:
-		__uaccess_begin();
+		__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 		__get_user_asm_nozero(*(u16 *)dst, (u16 __user *)src,
 			      ret, "w", "w", "=r", 2);
 		__uaccess_end();
 		return ret;
 	case 4:
-		__uaccess_begin();
+		__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 		__get_user_asm_nozero(*(u32 *)dst, (u32 __user *)src,
 			      ret, "l", "k", "=r", 4);
 		__uaccess_end();
 		return ret;
 	case 8:
-		__uaccess_begin();
+		__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 		__get_user_asm_nozero(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src,
 			      ret, "q", "", "=r", 8);
 		__uaccess_end();
 		return ret;
 	case 10:
-		__uaccess_begin();
+		__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 		__get_user_asm_nozero(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src,
 			       ret, "q", "", "=r", 10);
 		if (likely(!ret))
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ raw_copy_from_user(void *dst, const void
 		__uaccess_end();
 		return ret;
 	case 16:
-		__uaccess_begin();
+		__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 		__get_user_asm_nozero(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src,
 			       ret, "q", "", "=r", 16);
 		if (likely(!ret))
--- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ do {									\
 
 unsigned long __copy_user_ll(void *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
 {
-	__uaccess_begin();
+	__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 	if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n))
 		__copy_user(to, from, n);
 	else
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_user_ll);
 unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocache_nozero(void *to, const void __user *from,
 					unsigned long n)
 {
-	__uaccess_begin();
+	__uaccess_begin_nospec();
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
 	if (n > 64 && static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM2))
 		n = __copy_user_intel_nocache(to, from, n);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from torvalds@linux-foundation.org are

queue-4.14/objtool_Add_support_for_alternatives_at_the_end_of_a_section.patch
queue-4.14/x86pti_Do_not_enable_PTI_on_CPUs_which_are_not_vulnerable_to_Meltdown.patch
queue-4.14/x86_Introduce_barrier_nospec.patch
queue-4.14/x86speculation_Use_Indirect_Branch_Prediction_Barrier_in_context_switch.patch
queue-4.14/x86get_user_Use_pointer_masking_to_limit_speculation.patch
queue-4.14/x86_Introduce___uaccess_begin_nospec()_and_uaccess_try_nospec.patch
queue-4.14/x86cpufeature_Blacklist_SPEC_CTRLPRED_CMD_on_early_Spectre_v2_microcodes.patch
queue-4.14/x86cpufeatures_Add_Intel_feature_bits_for_Speculation_Control.patch
queue-4.14/x86paravirt_Remove_noreplace-paravirt_cmdline_option.patch
queue-4.14/KVM_VMX_Make_indirect_call_speculation_safe.patch
queue-4.14/x86msr_Add_definitions_for_new_speculation_control_MSRs.patch
queue-4.14/x86alternative_Print_unadorned_pointers.patch
queue-4.14/KVMVMX_Allow_direct_access_to_MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL.patch
queue-4.14/x86cpufeatures_Add_CPUID_7_EDX_CPUID_leaf.patch
queue-4.14/array_index_nospec_Sanitize_speculative_array_de-references.patch
queue-4.14/Documentation_Document_array_index_nospec.patch
queue-4.14/x86entry64_Remove_the_SYSCALL64_fast_path.patch
queue-4.14/x86retpoline_Remove_the_esprsp_thunk.patch
queue-4.14/x86bugs_Drop_one_mitigation_from_dmesg.patch
queue-4.14/x86cpufeatures_Add_AMD_feature_bits_for_Speculation_Control.patch
queue-4.14/scripts-faddr2line-fix-cross_compile-unset-error.patch
queue-4.14/KVMSVM_Allow_direct_access_to_MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL.patch
queue-4.14/x86asm_Move_status_from_thread_struct_to_thread_info.patch
queue-4.14/KVMx86_Add_IBPB_support.patch
queue-4.14/x86_Implement_array_index_mask_nospec.patch
queue-4.14/KVMVMX_Emulate_MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES.patch
queue-4.14/nl80211_Sanitize_array_index_in_parse_txq_params.patch
queue-4.14/moduleretpoline_Warn_about_missing_retpoline_in_module.patch
queue-4.14/x86speculation_Add_basic_IBPB_(Indirect_Branch_Prediction_Barrier)_support.patch
queue-4.14/x86speculation_Simplify_indirect_branch_prediction_barrier().patch
queue-4.14/x86nospec_Fix_header_guards_names.patch
queue-4.14/KVM_x86_Make_indirect_calls_in_emulator_speculation_safe.patch
queue-4.14/x86uaccess_Use___uaccess_begin_nospec()_and_uaccess_try_nospec.patch
queue-4.14/x86entry64_Push_extra_regs_right_away.patch
queue-4.14/x86usercopy_Replace_open_coded_stacclac_with___uaccess_begin_end.patch
queue-4.14/vfs_fdtable_Prevent_bounds-check_bypass_via_speculative_execution.patch
queue-4.14/x86retpoline_Simplify_vmexit_fill_RSB().patch
queue-4.14/objtool_Warn_on_stripped_section_symbol.patch
queue-4.14/x86spectre_Report_get_user_mitigation_for_spectre_v1.patch
queue-4.14/x86cpufeatures_Clean_up_Spectre_v2_related_CPUID_flags.patch
queue-4.14/x86syscall_Sanitize_syscall_table_de-references_under_speculation.patch
queue-4.14/objtool_Improve_retpoline_alternative_handling.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-02-05 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1517852316157102@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.