From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1517906853.9843.17.camel@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 1/1] block, bfq: add requeue-request hook From: Mike Galbraith To: Oleksandr Natalenko Cc: Paolo Valente , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com, alban.browaeys@gmail.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, ivan@ludios.org, 169364@studenti.unimore.it, Serena Ziviani Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:47:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <34a0aa9dead3a082615899b2830f60f1@natalenko.name> References: <20180205190510.5499-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <20180205190510.5499-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <1517903761.9843.12.camel@gmx.de> <34a0aa9dead3a082615899b2830f60f1@natalenko.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-ID: On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 09:37 +0100, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: > Hi. > > 06.02.2018 08:56, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > I was doing kbuilds, and it blew up on me twice. Switching back to cfq > > seemed to confirm it was indeed the patch causing trouble, but that's > > by no means a certainty. > > Just to note, I was using v4.15.1, not the latest git HEAD. Are you able > to reproduce it on the stable kernel? I didn't even try to wedge it into 4.15.1, tested it as posted. > Also, assuming this issue might be > unrelated to the BFQ itself, did you manage to reproduce the trouble > with another blk-mq scheduler (not CFQ, but mq-deadline/Kyber)? I can give another scheduler a go this afternoon. -Mike