From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
To: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] libmultipath: fix tur checker locking
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 21:30:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518208256.2937.16.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518134167-15938-2-git-send-email-bmarzins@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 17:56 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> ct->running is now an atomic variable. When the thread is started
> it is set to 1. When the checker wants to kill a thread, it
> atomically
> sets the value to 0 and reads the previous value. If it was 1,
> the checker cancels the thread. If it was 0, the nothing needs to be
> done. After the checker has dealt with the thread, it sets ct-
> >thread
> to NULL.
>
> When the thread is done, it atomicalllys sets the value of ct-
> >running
> to 0 and reads the previous value. If it was 1, the thread just
> exits.
> If it was 0, then the checker is trying to cancel the thread, and so
> the thread calls pause(), which is a cancellation point.
>
I'm missing one thing here. My poor brain is aching.
cleanup_func() can be entered in two ways: a) if the thread has been
cancelled and passed a cancellation point already, or b) if it exits
normally and calls pthread_cleanup_pop().
In case b), waiting for the cancellation request by calling pause()
makes sense to me. But in case a), the thread has already seen the
cancellation request - wouldn't calling pause() cause it to sleep
forever?
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-09 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-08 23:56 [PATCH v2 0/7] multipath: miscellaneous bug fixes Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-08 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] libmultipath: fix tur checker locking Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-09 16:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-09 17:26 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-09 17:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-09 20:30 ` Martin Wilck [this message]
2018-02-09 23:04 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-09 23:28 ` Martin Wilck
2018-02-09 23:36 ` Martin Wilck
2018-02-10 0:17 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-10 16:03 ` Martin Wilck
2018-02-10 0:36 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-10 16:11 ` Martin Wilck
2018-02-10 19:42 ` Martin Wilck
2018-02-12 18:44 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-12 19:16 ` Martin Wilck
2018-02-08 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] multipath: fix DEF_TIMEOUT use Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-08 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] multipathd: remove coalesce_paths from ev_add_map Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-12 20:30 ` Martin Wilck
2018-02-08 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] multipathd: remove unused configure parameter Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-08 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] Fix set_no_path_retry() regression Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-12 20:13 ` Martin Wilck
2018-02-08 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] multipathd: change spurious uevent msg priority Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-08 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] multipath: print sysfs state in fast list mode Benjamin Marzinski
2018-02-12 20:33 ` Martin Wilck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1518208256.2937.16.camel@suse.com \
--to=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.