From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: aman.deep@samsung.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu
Subject: patch "usb: ohci: Proper handling of ed_rm_list to handle race condition" added to usb-linus
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:47:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151871684030243@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
usb: ohci: Proper handling of ed_rm_list to handle race condition
to my usb git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git
in the usb-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
>From 46408ea558df13b110e0866b99624384a33bdeba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AMAN DEEP <aman.deep@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:55:01 +0800
Subject: usb: ohci: Proper handling of ed_rm_list to handle race condition
between usb_kill_urb() and finish_unlinks()
There is a race condition between finish_unlinks->finish_urb() function
and usb_kill_urb() in ohci controller case. The finish_urb calls
spin_unlock(&ohci->lock) before usb_hcd_giveback_urb() function call,
then if during this time, usb_kill_urb is called for another endpoint,
then new ed will be added to ed_rm_list at beginning for unlink, and
ed_rm_list will point to newly added.
When finish_urb() is completed in finish_unlinks() and ed->td_list
becomes empty as in below code (in finish_unlinks() function):
if (list_empty(&ed->td_list)) {
*last = ed->ed_next;
ed->ed_next = NULL;
} else if (ohci->rh_state == OHCI_RH_RUNNING) {
*last = ed->ed_next;
ed->ed_next = NULL;
ed_schedule(ohci, ed);
}
The *last = ed->ed_next will make ed_rm_list to point to ed->ed_next
and previously added ed by usb_kill_urb will be left unreferenced by
ed_rm_list. This causes usb_kill_urb() hang forever waiting for
finish_unlink to remove added ed from ed_rm_list.
The main reason for hang in this race condtion is addition and removal
of ed from ed_rm_list in the beginning during usb_kill_urb and later
last* is modified in finish_unlinks().
As suggested by Alan Stern, the solution for proper handling of
ohci->ed_rm_list is to remove ed from the ed_rm_list before finishing
any URBs. Then at the end, we can add ed back to the list if necessary.
This properly handle the updated ohci->ed_rm_list in usb_kill_urb().
Fixes: 977dcfdc6031 ("USB: OHCI: don't lose track of EDs when a controller dies")
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Aman Deep <aman.deep@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/host/ohci-q.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-q.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-q.c
index b2ec8c399363..4ccb85a67bb3 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-q.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-q.c
@@ -1019,6 +1019,8 @@ static void finish_unlinks(struct ohci_hcd *ohci)
* have modified this list. normally it's just prepending
* entries (which we'd ignore), but paranoia won't hurt.
*/
+ *last = ed->ed_next;
+ ed->ed_next = NULL;
modified = 0;
/* unlink urbs as requested, but rescan the list after
@@ -1077,21 +1079,22 @@ static void finish_unlinks(struct ohci_hcd *ohci)
goto rescan_this;
/*
- * If no TDs are queued, take ED off the ed_rm_list.
+ * If no TDs are queued, ED is now idle.
* Otherwise, if the HC is running, reschedule.
- * If not, leave it on the list for further dequeues.
+ * If the HC isn't running, add ED back to the
+ * start of the list for later processing.
*/
if (list_empty(&ed->td_list)) {
- *last = ed->ed_next;
- ed->ed_next = NULL;
ed->state = ED_IDLE;
list_del(&ed->in_use_list);
} else if (ohci->rh_state == OHCI_RH_RUNNING) {
- *last = ed->ed_next;
- ed->ed_next = NULL;
ed_schedule(ohci, ed);
} else {
- last = &ed->ed_next;
+ ed->ed_next = ohci->ed_rm_list;
+ ohci->ed_rm_list = ed;
+ /* Don't loop on the same ED */
+ if (last == &ohci->ed_rm_list)
+ last = &ed->ed_next;
}
if (modified)
--
2.16.1
reply other threads:[~2018-02-15 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151871684030243@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=aman.deep@samsung.com \
--cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.