From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: briannorris@chromium.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
huxm@marvell.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mwifiex: resolve reset vs. remove()/shutdown() deadlocks" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:42:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151905857081140@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mwifiex: resolve reset vs. remove()/shutdown() deadlocks
to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mwifiex-resolve-reset-vs.-remove-shutdown-deadlocks.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From a64e7a79dd6030479caad603c8d78e6c9c14904f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:08:37 -0800
Subject: mwifiex: resolve reset vs. remove()/shutdown() deadlocks
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
commit a64e7a79dd6030479caad603c8d78e6c9c14904f upstream.
Commit b014e96d1abb ("PCI: Protect pci_error_handlers->reset_notify()
usage with device_lock()") resolves races between driver reset and
removal, but it introduces some new deadlock problems. If we see a
timeout while we've already started suspending, removing, or shutting
down the driver, we might see:
(a) a worker thread, running mwifiex_pcie_work() ->
mwifiex_pcie_card_reset_work() -> pci_reset_function()
(b) a removal thread, running mwifiex_pcie_remove() ->
mwifiex_free_adapter() -> mwifiex_unregister() ->
mwifiex_cleanup_pcie() -> cancel_work_sync(&card->work)
Unfortunately, mwifiex_pcie_remove() already holds the device lock that
pci_reset_function() is now requesting, and so we see a deadlock.
It's necessary to cancel and synchronize our outstanding work before
tearing down the driver, so we can't have this work wait indefinitely
for the lock.
It's reasonable to only "try" to reset here, since this will mostly
happen for cases where it's already difficult to reset the firmware
anyway (e.g., while we're suspending or powering off the system). And if
reset *really* needs to happen, we can always try again later.
Fixes: b014e96d1abb ("PCI: Protect pci_error_handlers->reset_notify() usage with device_lock()")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
@@ -2781,7 +2781,10 @@ static void mwifiex_pcie_card_reset_work
{
struct pcie_service_card *card = adapter->card;
- pci_reset_function(card->dev);
+ /* We can't afford to wait here; remove() might be waiting on us. If we
+ * can't grab the device lock, maybe we'll get another chance later.
+ */
+ pci_try_reset_function(card->dev);
}
static void mwifiex_pcie_work(struct work_struct *work)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from briannorris@chromium.org are
queue-4.15/mwifiex-resolve-reset-vs.-remove-shutdown-deadlocks.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-02-19 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151905857081140@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=huxm@marvell.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.