From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rui.y.wang@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect bounds with old _sigfault" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:27:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15191224513088@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect bounds with old _sigfault
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
selftests-x86-mpx-fix-incorrect-bounds-with-old-_sigfault.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 961888b1d76d84efc66a8f5604b06ac12ac2f978 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:34:10 +0800
Subject: selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect bounds with old _sigfault
From: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com>
commit 961888b1d76d84efc66a8f5604b06ac12ac2f978 upstream.
For distributions with old userspace header files, the _sigfault
structure is different. mpx-mini-test fails with the following
error:
[root@Purley]# mpx-mini-test_64 tabletest
XSAVE is supported by HW & OS
XSAVE processor supported state mask: 0x2ff
XSAVE OS supported state mask: 0x2ff
BNDREGS: size: 64 user: 1 supervisor: 0 aligned: 0
BNDCSR: size: 64 user: 1 supervisor: 0 aligned: 0
starting mpx bounds table test
ERROR: siginfo bounds do not match shadow bounds for register 0
Fix it by using the correct offset of _lower/_upper in _sigfault.
RHEL needs this patch to work.
Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Fixes: e754aedc26ef ("x86/mpx, selftests: Add MPX self test")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1513586050-1641-1-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
@@ -315,11 +315,39 @@ static inline void *__si_bounds_upper(si
return si->si_upper;
}
#else
+
+/*
+ * This deals with old version of _sigfault in some distros:
+ *
+
+old _sigfault:
+ struct {
+ void *si_addr;
+ } _sigfault;
+
+new _sigfault:
+ struct {
+ void __user *_addr;
+ int _trapno;
+ short _addr_lsb;
+ union {
+ struct {
+ void __user *_lower;
+ void __user *_upper;
+ } _addr_bnd;
+ __u32 _pkey;
+ };
+ } _sigfault;
+ *
+ */
+
static inline void **__si_bounds_hack(siginfo_t *si)
{
void *sigfault = &si->_sifields._sigfault;
void *end_sigfault = sigfault + sizeof(si->_sifields._sigfault);
- void **__si_lower = end_sigfault;
+ int *trapno = (int*)end_sigfault;
+ /* skip _trapno and _addr_lsb */
+ void **__si_lower = (void**)(trapno + 2);
return __si_lower;
}
@@ -331,7 +359,7 @@ static inline void *__si_bounds_lower(si
static inline void *__si_bounds_upper(siginfo_t *si)
{
- return (*__si_bounds_hack(si)) + sizeof(void *);
+ return *(__si_bounds_hack(si) + 1);
}
#endif
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rui.y.wang@intel.com are
queue-4.9/selftests-x86-mpx-fix-incorrect-bounds-with-old-_sigfault.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15191224513088@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rui.y.wang@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.