From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
joe.konno@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/speculation: Add <asm/msr-index.h> dependency" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:27:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151912245720108@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/speculation: Add <asm/msr-index.h> dependency
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-speculation-add-asm-msr-index.h-dependency.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From ea00f301285ea2f07393678cd2b6057878320c9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:28:19 +0100
Subject: x86/speculation: Add <asm/msr-index.h> dependency
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
commit ea00f301285ea2f07393678cd2b6057878320c9d upstream.
Joe Konno reported a compile failure resulting from using an MSR
without inclusion of <asm/msr-index.h>, and while the current code builds
fine (by accident) this needs fixing for future patches.
Reported-by: Joe Konno <joe.konno@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org
Cc: dwmw@amazon.co.uk
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: luto@kernel.org
Fixes: 20ffa1caecca ("x86/speculation: Add basic IBPB (Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier) support")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180213132819.GJ25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <asm/alternative.h>
#include <asm/alternative-asm.h>
#include <asm/cpufeatures.h>
+#include <asm/msr-index.h>
#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from peterz@infradead.org are
queue-4.9/x86-spectre-fix-an-error-message.patch
queue-4.9/nospec-move-array_index_nospec-parameter-checking-into-separate-macro.patch
queue-4.9/x86-nvmx-properly-set-spec_ctrl-and-pred_cmd-before-merging-msrs.patch
queue-4.9/x86-speculation-add-asm-msr-index.h-dependency.patch
queue-4.9/x86-cpu-rename-cpu_data.x86_mask-to-cpu_data.x86_stepping.patch
queue-4.9/x86-cpu-change-type-of-x86_cache_size-variable-to-unsigned-int.patch
queue-4.9/x86-speculation-update-speculation-control-microcode-blacklist.patch
queue-4.9/x86-speculation-correct-speculation-control-microcode-blacklist-again.patch
queue-4.9/selftests-x86-do-not-rely-on-int-0x80-in-single_step_syscall.c.patch
queue-4.9/selftests-x86-mpx-fix-incorrect-bounds-with-old-_sigfault.patch
queue-4.9/selftests-x86-pkeys-remove-unused-functions.patch
queue-4.9/x86-speculation-fix-up-array_index_nospec_mask-asm-constraint.patch
queue-4.9/kvm-x86-reduce-retpoline-performance-impact-in-slot_handle_level_range-by-always-inlining-iterator-helper-methods.patch
queue-4.9/selftests-x86-do-not-rely-on-int-0x80-in-test_mremap_vdso.c.patch
queue-4.9/x86-speculation-clean-up-various-spectre-related-details.patch
queue-4.9/x86-entry-64-compat-clear-registers-for-compat-syscalls-to-reduce-speculation-attack-surface.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151912245720108@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe.konno@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.