From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: bo.li.liu@oracle.com, dsterba@suse.com, jbacik@fb.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free on root->orphan_block_rsv" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:38:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15191411253956@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 1a932ef4e47984dee227834667b5ff5a334e4805 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:02:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix use-after-free on root->orphan_block_rsv
I got these from running generic/475,
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 26384 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3326 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0x1ac/0x2b0 [btrfs]
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
IP: btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c/0x70 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
btrfs_orphan_release_metadata+0x9f/0x200 [btrfs]
btrfs_orphan_del+0x10d/0x170 [btrfs]
btrfs_setattr+0x500/0x640 [btrfs]
notify_change+0x7ae/0x870
do_truncate+0xca/0x130
vfs_truncate+0x2ee/0x3d0
do_sys_truncate+0xaf/0xf0
SyS_truncate+0xe/0x10
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0x96
The race is between btrfs_orphan_commit_root and btrfs_orphan_del,
t1 t2
btrfs_orphan_commit_root btrfs_orphan_del
spin_lock
check (&root->orphan_inodes)
root->orphan_block_rsv = NULL;
spin_unlock
atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
access root->orphan_block_rsv
Accessing root->orphan_block_rsv must be done before decreasing
root->orphan_inodes.
cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.12+
Fixes: 703c88e03524 ("Btrfs: fix tracking of orphan inode count")
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 44a152d8f32f..29b491328f4e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3387,6 +3387,11 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
ret = btrfs_orphan_reserve_metadata(trans, inode);
ASSERT(!ret);
if (ret) {
+ /*
+ * dec doesn't need spin_lock as ->orphan_block_rsv
+ * would be released only if ->orphan_inodes is
+ * zero.
+ */
atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
&inode->runtime_flags);
@@ -3401,12 +3406,17 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (insert >= 1) {
ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
if (ret) {
- atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
if (reserve) {
clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
&inode->runtime_flags);
btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
}
+ /*
+ * btrfs_orphan_commit_root may race with us and set
+ * ->orphan_block_rsv to zero, in order to avoid that,
+ * decrease ->orphan_inodes after everything is done.
+ */
+ atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
if (ret != -EEXIST) {
clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
&inode->runtime_flags);
@@ -3438,28 +3448,26 @@ static int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
{
struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
int delete_item = 0;
- int release_rsv = 0;
int ret = 0;
- spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
&inode->runtime_flags))
delete_item = 1;
+ if (delete_item && trans)
+ ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
+
if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
&inode->runtime_flags))
- release_rsv = 1;
- spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
+ btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
- if (delete_item) {
+ /*
+ * btrfs_orphan_commit_root may race with us and set ->orphan_block_rsv
+ * to zero, in order to avoid that, decrease ->orphan_inodes after
+ * everything is done.
+ */
+ if (delete_item)
atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
- if (trans)
- ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root,
- btrfs_ino(inode));
- }
-
- if (release_rsv)
- btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
return ret;
}
reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15191411253956@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.