From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tpm: fix intermittent failure with self tests
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:09:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519168191.4446.31.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180220212847.il76cysi3t4ibhhi@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 23:28 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:27:25PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:26:00PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:51:51PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:43 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I get merge conflicts in my tree but I'll review this.
> > > >
> > > > You told me to rebase it on that patch that wasn't in your
> > > > tree:
> > > >
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10208965/
> > > >
> > > > If you put it in your tree, I can just rebase on top of
> > > > everything.
> > > >
> > > > James
> > >
> > > Aah. Sorry, my bad I'll move forward on testing :-)
> > >
> > > /Jarkko
> >
> > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > /Jarkko
>
> These must be taken away:
>
> [ 2.843641] tpm tpm0: TPM: running incremental selftest
> [ 2.854087] tpm tpm0: TPM: selftest succeeded
I'm not wedded to having the messages, but it helps give context when
something like this happens:
[ 1.550099] tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0xFE, rev-id 2)
[ 1.550108] tpm tpm0: TPM: running incremental selftest
[ 1.602294] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (323) occurred incremental selftest
[ 1.602320] tpm tpm0: TPM: incremental selftest failed
[ 1.602322] tpm tpm0: TPM: running full selftest
[ 2.523689] tpm tpm0: TPM: selftest succeeded
It also helps explain why I lost a second in the boot sequence to the
TPM having to run a full self test.
Without the chatty messages, what you see is
[ 1.550099] tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0xFE, rev-id 2)
[
1.602294] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (323) occurred incremental selftest
Which is a bit harder to interpret.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-19 12:24 [PATCH v3] tpm: fix intermittent failure with self tests James Bottomley
2018-02-20 17:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-20 17:51 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-20 19:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-20 21:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-20 21:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-20 21:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-20 23:09 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2018-02-21 7:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-21 7:42 ` Paul Menzel
2018-02-21 13:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-21 7:04 ` Paul Menzel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1519168191.4446.31.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.