From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com (mail-wr0-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554B5787F8 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id p104so5284524wrc.12 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:58:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wy2XCQO152FaCvtkEnpr1aR/Drq3rlP1tf4XvDHb/4M=; b=FjsEz4eif1BIqU7GPvJxCfdsU3vMV0ePezg3FUGIHNwl40BJq4m/vQ+T/QIE67QrqF Q3TsKm6BI3KUxE4K9xyuoqI2aJKweFs19mJJQBsQ1enadmu40XN/iJOifneJjXbERmg5 02FZOSz5I5vIk/T0mnXzLPqD9+8h8DlM+kyMM0ys4RAxoZ3OFwA0KyMJS+fGrYnXccu9 H9wA32flVdPOP622boeZmGV3L+J8+mV8NMuEAxoYbRM8wOXwWLc1TFUL0XPh92N+ryQ9 I3OMMi/KWVLkAx0SKqECBT+MJCfo/OjVLVBemhMzC1rYyF7YsjPBCao97VtBSfUp6fxk ZqWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wy2XCQO152FaCvtkEnpr1aR/Drq3rlP1tf4XvDHb/4M=; b=qZraLj/zphxccddnpqIXrLhnUktu9SqAtsL++TzlxlN7NRoAKGQUDyqlKl0bKudI25 vRLChdKOOpWDm4lxPs3QvQFwaeFYU3pMgWDJXcsDcWIGjkOp3QeTSzRXWxkcXwCe1W51 4+67YvXD6O5ZxhrNdcpx2IrWtkyJf46Cv752TpMgrA//zumMc6rBkxZ0ttt3mI4pNW20 +ONeXTKmRQs2zqUl8DdxMYqr7RDmBLooQo+id21P58DYqVP73IDQC4WHgBoE1ieynS73 4+cg3epQZ3Vs8R3COyyD5g0hwPHJUnPAeOSE+AXVnp0eiGoypuQDsYS64fmKkmLYuuBt gfRw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPC5JgQcH1cEUJE1EuoIpfYiL6Rufy90+Scfnau08ny2VW2UTOd2 BPRu+G7dYBReIs0sz9DLrcUx X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227XInPOA3lw9gZUYN8lBEGZ2zg3Yoh8t+xgEGh+FtJL9a15NmXpDnSrD0t/X7r56WXs3s6fMw== X-Received: by 10.28.239.19 with SMTP id n19mr2445567wmh.20.1519225099121; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:58:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p548497B7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [84.132.151.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 62sm2433527wrf.24.2018.02.21.06.58.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:58:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1519225097.6698.8.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: "Burton, Ross" , Joe MacDonald Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:58:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <8d5be4e4-3fd9-a0f2-c5cf-b967cf428416@gmail.com> <20180221140252.d4rmbn73c3nzsvac@mentor.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OpenEmbedded Devel List Subject: Re: Splitting meta-oe? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:58:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 14:14 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > > But that kind of mechanism seems highly prone to breakage and > > likely to > > be highly contentious even if it was shown to be reliable, so it > > may not > > get beyond a "that'd be nice" thing for me. > > > > Unless someone else has already implemented it and I'm just not > > aware of > > how to use it?  :-) > > > > meta-freescale (iirc) does this, conditionally adds > sub-layers to BBLAYERS based on what other layers are already > enabled. The approach used by meta-freescale works with older releases. BBFILES_DYNAMIC [1] (supported by bitbake 1.36/Yocto 2.4) is a bit more robust. [1] https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/140532/ -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.