From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com (mail-wr0-f194.google.com [209.85.128.194]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B6371AB3 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f194.google.com with SMTP id v65so9759017wrc.11 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 01:18:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0YALnYX4QTAPoGVBV56lWfx2kjlejbApQEMufnwhZjE=; b=VrHMZwFvkZUbBv/g/iYGYAU/683Jfo7ivPPLOXD4iUFt1Rm0Ty2OCchkA4iKeTm9mU 1bBTbaBYNWG9qnTURJa09x72LnlP9dL0eN8tGwRmmuefAW511oARRTWoW/3yhEB7ft73 reaIIfKFxWOG1jTCkE36czJsXFcydOBn2IfboqDaf50j8c0T9ZfHjtFO2KmGDhnO4hwG 0d4J5w0X9okQ/llHgGkeDDUXxLdcNszSWa0aeW6CeL68FC30C+k5iEaxCYZg2rvxqV/Y CP6NUgTyTTo34ireYDnSAHVu2h4w+vrHUftrAg4x836C0z4xGtuG7xyW4bMW0LAQ3zpT CBYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0YALnYX4QTAPoGVBV56lWfx2kjlejbApQEMufnwhZjE=; b=WRYe04Y/LlDGmBBxWHhK7140l7zsFSnaRdDgBh/96BSeW7RF9sT4tO+KKXVGBhHH55 t8g98/qqBt8wFJWMfS1eHUWNX8S//48l1N8ZbkJlVV5TDxhQCnqgAmPbgG0JCoI9pgDQ +9hLwov7rntO7ltDfGrtNDk6AAGAgaRkt8s1wkmcBtnUiAlHcwETpGixFX+W1O6yOpnJ 1mvFhE9y2QFeS+2d23P0lYMSz34VDcVOg1fUAPficMc5jxA6e2YiOaz9g9HMtGUyXz4T Pt41+Cdnoq0/DDNx7McJXCV4IeVYc9HhzhPzwzF84KR0x1RIBE8IoP1heZOFZ6dTKXoS wfIw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBV+D7duUOINnG4y/5H9kjUrby9gBmJE2GkkDd9kowDNtPa7JbK fz0C23Cj7PWc/0nXtkXpQWCCkf8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2266qastuk6EmF7hNebHsVCO0AaAhRB0/irHXRFr8MNW0kJeumhQeLw9+zKYBJm8Tzk/vw+oRg== X-Received: by 10.223.197.197 with SMTP id v5mr5657814wrg.161.1519291114736; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 01:18:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p548497B7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [84.132.151.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e15sm38219060wmd.26.2018.02.22.01.18.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 01:18:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1519291113.6698.11.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Andreas Oberritter Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:18:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180221203352.55cd9a96@t460p> References: <8d5be4e4-3fd9-a0f2-c5cf-b967cf428416@gmail.com> <20180221140252.d4rmbn73c3nzsvac@mentor.com> <1519225097.6698.8.camel@intel.com> <20180221203352.55cd9a96@t460p> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OpenEmbedded Devel List Subject: Re: Splitting meta-oe? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:18:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 20:33 +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:58:17 +0100 > Patrick Ohly wrote: > > The approach used by meta-freescale works with older releases. > > BBFILES_DYNAMIC [1] (supported by bitbake 1.36/Yocto 2.4) is a bit > > more > > robust. > > > > [1] https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/140532/ > > > > That's interesting. Is it possible to express dependencies on more > than one layer for a group of recipes with this mechanism? No, not at the moment. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.