From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: johannes.berg@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cfg80211: check dev_set_name() return value" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 19:23:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519323822212168@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cfg80211: check dev_set_name() return value
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cfg80211-check-dev_set_name-return-value.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 59b179b48ce2a6076448a44531242ac2b3f6cef2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:58:27 +0100
Subject: cfg80211: check dev_set_name() return value
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
commit 59b179b48ce2a6076448a44531242ac2b3f6cef2 upstream.
syzbot reported a warning from rfkill_alloc(), and after a while
I think that the reason is that it was doing fault injection and
the dev_set_name() failed, leaving the name NULL, and we didn't
check the return value and got to rfkill_alloc() with a NULL name.
Since we really don't want a NULL name, we ought to check the
return value.
Fixes: fb28ad35906a ("net: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()")
Reported-by: syzbot+1ddfb3357e1d7bb5b5d3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/wireless/core.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/wireless/core.c
+++ b/net/wireless/core.c
@@ -390,6 +390,8 @@ struct wiphy *wiphy_new_nm(const struct
if (rv)
goto use_default_name;
} else {
+ int rv;
+
use_default_name:
/* NOTE: This is *probably* safe w/out holding rtnl because of
* the restrictions on phy names. Probably this call could
@@ -397,7 +399,11 @@ use_default_name:
* phyX. But, might should add some locking and check return
* value, and use a different name if this one exists?
*/
- dev_set_name(&rdev->wiphy.dev, PHY_NAME "%d", rdev->wiphy_idx);
+ rv = dev_set_name(&rdev->wiphy.dev, PHY_NAME "%d", rdev->wiphy_idx);
+ if (rv < 0) {
+ kfree(rdev);
+ return NULL;
+ }
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->wdev_list);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from johannes.berg@intel.com are
queue-4.4/cfg80211-check-dev_set_name-return-value.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1519323822212168@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.