From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tony@atomide.com, alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ARM: OMAP2+: Fix SRAM virt to phys translation for save_secure_ram_context" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:59:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151938354371129@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ARM: OMAP2+: Fix SRAM virt to phys translation for save_secure_ram_context
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm-omap2-fix-sram-virt-to-phys-translation-for-save_secure_ram_context.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Fri Feb 23 11:48:40 CET 2018
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:57:26 -0800
Subject: ARM: OMAP2+: Fix SRAM virt to phys translation for save_secure_ram_context
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
[ Upstream commit d09220a887f70368afa79e850c95e74890c0a32d ]
With the CMA changes from Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, it
was noticed that n900 stopped booting. After investigating it turned
out that n900 save_secure_ram_context does some whacky virtual to
physical address translation for the SRAM data address.
As we now only have minimal parts of omap3 idle code copied to SRAM,
running save_secure_ram_context() in SRAM is not needed. It only gets
called on PM init. And it seems there's no need to ever call this from
SRAM idle code.
So let's just keep save_secure_ram_context() in DDR, and pass it the
physical address of the parameters. We can do everything else in
omap-secure.c like we already do for other secure code.
And since we don't have any documentation, I still have no clue what
the values for 0, 1 and 1 for the parameters might be. If somebody has
figured it out, please do send a patch to add some comments.
Debugged-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h | 4 ++++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h | 4 ----
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 13 ++++---------
arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S | 26 ++++----------------------
5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
@@ -73,6 +73,25 @@ phys_addr_t omap_secure_ram_mempool_base
return omap_secure_memblock_base;
}
+u32 omap3_save_secure_ram(void __iomem *addr, int size)
+{
+ u32 ret;
+ u32 param[5];
+
+ if (size != OMAP3_SAVE_SECURE_RAM_SZ)
+ return OMAP3_SAVE_SECURE_RAM_SZ;
+
+ param[0] = 4; /* Number of arguments */
+ param[1] = __pa(addr); /* Physical address for saving */
+ param[2] = 0;
+ param[3] = 1;
+ param[4] = 1;
+
+ ret = save_secure_ram_context(__pa(param));
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/**
* rx51_secure_dispatcher: Routine to dispatch secure PPA API calls
* @idx: The PPA API index
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
/* Maximum Secure memory storage size */
#define OMAP_SECURE_RAM_STORAGE (88 * SZ_1K)
+#define OMAP3_SAVE_SECURE_RAM_SZ 0x803F
+
/* Secure low power HAL API index */
#define OMAP4_HAL_SAVESECURERAM_INDEX 0x1a
#define OMAP4_HAL_SAVEHW_INDEX 0x1b
@@ -65,6 +67,8 @@ extern u32 omap_smc2(u32 id, u32 falg, u
extern u32 omap_smc3(u32 id, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 pargs);
extern phys_addr_t omap_secure_ram_mempool_base(void);
extern int omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock(void);
+extern u32 save_secure_ram_context(u32 args_pa);
+extern u32 omap3_save_secure_ram(void __iomem *save_regs, int size);
extern u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 nargs,
u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 arg3, u32 arg4);
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
@@ -81,10 +81,6 @@ extern unsigned int omap3_do_wfi_sz;
/* ... and its pointer from SRAM after copy */
extern void (*omap3_do_wfi_sram)(void);
-/* save_secure_ram_context function pointer and size, for copy to SRAM */
-extern int save_secure_ram_context(u32 *addr);
-extern unsigned int save_secure_ram_context_sz;
-
extern void omap3_save_scratchpad_contents(void);
#define PM_RTA_ERRATUM_i608 (1 << 0)
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
#include "prm3xxx.h"
#include "pm.h"
#include "sdrc.h"
+#include "omap-secure.h"
#include "sram.h"
#include "control.h"
#include "vc.h"
@@ -66,7 +67,6 @@ struct power_state {
static LIST_HEAD(pwrst_list);
-static int (*_omap_save_secure_sram)(u32 *addr);
void (*omap3_do_wfi_sram)(void);
static struct powerdomain *mpu_pwrdm, *neon_pwrdm;
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ static void omap3_save_secure_ram_contex
* will hang the system.
*/
pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm, PWRDM_POWER_ON);
- ret = _omap_save_secure_sram((u32 *)(unsigned long)
- __pa(omap3_secure_ram_storage));
+ ret = omap3_save_secure_ram(omap3_secure_ram_storage,
+ OMAP3_SAVE_SECURE_RAM_SZ);
pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm, mpu_next_state);
/* Following is for error tracking, it should not happen */
if (ret) {
@@ -434,15 +434,10 @@ static int __init pwrdms_setup(struct po
*
* The minimum set of functions is pushed to SRAM for execution:
* - omap3_do_wfi for erratum i581 WA,
- * - save_secure_ram_context for security extensions.
*/
void omap_push_sram_idle(void)
{
omap3_do_wfi_sram = omap_sram_push(omap3_do_wfi, omap3_do_wfi_sz);
-
- if (omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP)
- _omap_save_secure_sram = omap_sram_push(save_secure_ram_context,
- save_secure_ram_context_sz);
}
static void __init pm_errata_configure(void)
@@ -554,7 +549,7 @@ int __init omap3_pm_init(void)
clkdm_add_wkdep(neon_clkdm, mpu_clkdm);
if (omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP) {
omap3_secure_ram_storage =
- kmalloc(0x803F, GFP_KERNEL);
+ kmalloc(OMAP3_SAVE_SECURE_RAM_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!omap3_secure_ram_storage)
pr_err("Memory allocation failed when allocating for secure sram context\n");
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
@@ -93,20 +93,13 @@ ENTRY(enable_omap3630_toggle_l2_on_resto
ENDPROC(enable_omap3630_toggle_l2_on_restore)
/*
- * Function to call rom code to save secure ram context. This gets
- * relocated to SRAM, so it can be all in .data section. Otherwise
- * we need to initialize api_params separately.
+ * Function to call rom code to save secure ram context.
+ *
+ * r0 = physical address of the parameters
*/
- .data
- .align 3
ENTRY(save_secure_ram_context)
stmfd sp!, {r4 - r11, lr} @ save registers on stack
- adr r3, api_params @ r3 points to parameters
- str r0, [r3,#0x4] @ r0 has sdram address
- ldr r12, high_mask
- and r3, r3, r12
- ldr r12, sram_phy_addr_mask
- orr r3, r3, r12
+ mov r3, r0 @ physical address of parameters
mov r0, #25 @ set service ID for PPA
mov r12, r0 @ copy secure service ID in r12
mov r1, #0 @ set task id for ROM code in r1
@@ -120,18 +113,7 @@ ENTRY(save_secure_ram_context)
nop
nop
ldmfd sp!, {r4 - r11, pc}
- .align
-sram_phy_addr_mask:
- .word SRAM_BASE_P
-high_mask:
- .word 0xffff
-api_params:
- .word 0x4, 0x0, 0x0, 0x1, 0x1
ENDPROC(save_secure_ram_context)
-ENTRY(save_secure_ram_context_sz)
- .word . - save_secure_ram_context
-
- .text
/*
* ======================
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tony@atomide.com are
queue-4.9/arm-dts-fix-elm-interrupt-compiler-warning.patch
queue-4.9/arm-omap2-fix-sram-virt-to-phys-translation-for-save_secure_ram_context.patch
queue-4.9/arm-dts-fix-omap4-hang-with-gps-connected-to-usb-by-using-wakeupgen.patch
queue-4.9/arm-dts-logicpd-som-lv-fix-gpmc-addresses-for-nand-and-enet.patch
queue-4.9/arm-am33xx-prm-remove-am33xx_pwrdm_read_prev_pwrst-function.patch
queue-4.9/arm-dts-logicpd-somlv-fix-wl127x-pinmux.patch
queue-4.9/arm-dts-am4372-correct-the-interrupts_properties-of-mcasp.patch
queue-4.9/arm-dts-am437x-cm-t43-correct-the-dmas-property-of-spi0.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-02-23 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151938354371129@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.