From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jeyu@kernel.org,
keescook@chromium.org, mingo@kernel.org, msebor@gcc.gnu.org,
peterz@infradead.org, rric@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/oprofile: Fix bogus GCC-8 warning in nmi_setup()" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:53:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15196603972538@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/oprofile: Fix bogus GCC-8 warning in nmi_setup()
to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-oprofile-fix-bogus-gcc-8-warning-in-nmi_setup.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 85c615eb52222bc5fab6c7190d146bc59fac289e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:58:21 +0100
Subject: x86/oprofile: Fix bogus GCC-8 warning in nmi_setup()
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
commit 85c615eb52222bc5fab6c7190d146bc59fac289e upstream.
GCC-8 shows a warning for the x86 oprofile code that copies per-CPU
data from CPU 0 to all other CPUs, which when building a non-SMP
kernel turns into a memcpy() with identical source and destination
pointers:
arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c: In function 'mux_clone':
arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c:285:2: error: 'memcpy' source argument is the same as destination [-Werror=restrict]
memcpy(per_cpu(cpu_msrs, cpu).multiplex,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
per_cpu(cpu_msrs, 0).multiplex,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
sizeof(struct op_msr) * model->num_virt_counters);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c: In function 'nmi_setup':
arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c:466:3: error: 'memcpy' source argument is the same as destination [-Werror=restrict]
arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c:470:3: error: 'memcpy' source argument is the same as destination [-Werror=restrict]
I have analyzed a number of such warnings now: some are valid and the
GCC warning is welcome. Others turned out to be false-positives, and
GCC was changed to not warn about those any more. This is a corner case
that is a false-positive but the GCC developers feel it's better to keep
warning about it.
In this case, it seems best to work around it by telling GCC
a little more clearly that this code path is never hit with
an IS_ENABLED() configuration check.
Cc:stable as we also want old kernels to build cleanly with GCC-8.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Sebor <msebor@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: oprofile-list@lists.sf.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180220205826.2008875-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84095
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static int nmi_setup(void)
goto fail;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- if (!cpu)
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) || !cpu)
continue;
memcpy(per_cpu(cpu_msrs, cpu).counters,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from arnd@arndb.de are
queue-3.18/x86-oprofile-fix-bogus-gcc-8-warning-in-nmi_setup.patch
queue-3.18/cfg80211-fix-cfg80211_beacon_dup.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-02-26 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15196603972538@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=msebor@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.