Patch "drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     drm-i915-breadcrumbs-ignore-unsubmitted-signalers.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 117172c8f9d40ba1de8cb35c6e614422faa03330 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:01:54 +0000
Subject: drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers

From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

commit 117172c8f9d40ba1de8cb35c6e614422faa03330 upstream.

When a request is preempted, it is unsubmitted from the HW queue and
removed from the active list of breadcrumbs. In the process, this
however triggers the signaler and it may see the clear rbtree with the
old, and still valid, seqno, or it may match the cleared seqno with the
now zero rq->global_seqno. This confuses the signaler into action and
signaling the fence.

Fixes: d6a2289d9d6b ("drm/i915: Remove the preempted request from the execution queue")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.12+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180206094633.30181-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit fd10e2ce9905030d922e179a8047a4d50daffd8e)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180213090154.17373-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c |   29 ++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -541,29 +541,16 @@ void intel_engine_remove_wait(struct int
 	spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
 }
 
-static bool signal_valid(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
-{
-	return intel_wait_check_request(&request->signaling.wait, request);
-}
-
 static bool signal_complete(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
 {
 	if (!request)
 		return false;
 
-	/* If another process served as the bottom-half it may have already
-	 * signalled that this wait is already completed.
-	 */
-	if (intel_wait_complete(&request->signaling.wait))
-		return signal_valid(request);
-
-	/* Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the
+	/*
+	 * Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the
 	 * seqno to be visible or if the GPU hung.
 	 */
-	if (__i915_request_irq_complete(request))
-		return true;
-
-	return false;
+	return __i915_request_irq_complete(request);
 }
 
 static struct drm_i915_gem_request *to_signaler(struct rb_node *rb)
@@ -606,9 +593,13 @@ static int intel_breadcrumbs_signaler(vo
 			request = i915_gem_request_get_rcu(request);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		if (signal_complete(request)) {
-			local_bh_disable();
-			dma_fence_signal(&request->fence);
-			local_bh_enable(); /* kick start the tasklets */
+			if (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
+				      &request->fence.flags)) {
+				local_bh_disable();
+				dma_fence_signal(&request->fence);
+				GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_request_completed(request));
+				local_bh_enable(); /* kick start the tasklets */
+			}
 
 			spin_lock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from chris@chris-wilson.co.uk are

queue-4.14/drm-handle-unexpected-holes-in-color-eviction.patch
queue-4.14/drm-i915-breadcrumbs-ignore-unsubmitted-signalers.patch