From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "s390/qeth: fix double-free on IP add/remove race" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 19:30:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152039343817160@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/qeth: fix double-free on IP add/remove race
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-qeth-fix-double-free-on-ip-add-remove-race.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Mar 6 19:02:12 PST 2018
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:58:14 +0100
Subject: s390/qeth: fix double-free on IP add/remove race
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 14d066c3531a87f727968cacd85bd95c75f59843 ]
Registering an IPv4 address with the HW takes quite a while, so we
temporarily drop the ip_htable lock. Any concurrent add/remove of the
same IP adjusts the IP's use count, and (on remove) is then blocked by
addr->in_progress.
After the register call has completed, we check the use count for
concurrently attempted add/remove calls - and possibly straight-away
deregister the IP again. This happens via l3_delete_ip(), which
1) looks up the queried IP in the htable (getting a reference to the
*same* queried object),
2) deregisters the IP from the HW, and
3) frees the IP object.
The caller in l3_add_ip() then does a second free on the same object.
For this case, skip all the extra checks and lookups in l3_delete_ip()
and just deregister & free the IP object ourselves.
Fixes: 5f78e29ceebf ("qeth: optimize IP handling in rx_mode callback")
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
@@ -319,7 +319,8 @@ int qeth_l3_add_ip(struct qeth_card *car
(rc == IPA_RC_LAN_OFFLINE)) {
addr->disp_flag = QETH_DISP_ADDR_DO_NOTHING;
if (addr->ref_counter < 1) {
- qeth_l3_delete_ip(card, addr);
+ qeth_l3_deregister_addr_entry(card, addr);
+ hash_del(&addr->hnode);
kfree(addr);
}
} else {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-setip-command-handling.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-ip-address-lookup-for-l3-devices.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-ipa-command-submission-race.patch
queue-4.14/revert-s390-qeth-fix-using-of-ref-counter-for-rxip-addresses.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-overestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-double-free-on-ip-add-remove-race.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-ip-removal-on-offline-cards.patch
queue-4.14/s390-qeth-fix-underestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152039343817160@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.