From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "s390/qeth: fix underestimated count of buffer elements" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 19:31:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152039349723452@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/qeth: fix underestimated count of buffer elements
to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-qeth-fix-underestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Mar 6 19:02:57 PST 2018
From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 11:03:49 +0100
Subject: s390/qeth: fix underestimated count of buffer elements
From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 89271c65edd599207dd982007900506283c90ae3 ]
For a memory range/skb where the last byte falls onto a page boundary
(ie. 'end' is of the form xxx...xxx001), the PFN_UP() part of the
calculation currently doesn't round up to the next PFN due to an
off-by-one error.
Thus qeth believes that the skb occupies one page less than it
actually does, and may select a IO buffer that doesn't have enough spare
buffer elements to fit all of the skb's data.
HW detects this as a malformed buffer descriptor, and raises an
exception which then triggers device recovery.
Fixes: 2863c61334aa ("qeth: refactor calculation of SBALE count")
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ struct qeth_trap_id {
*/
static inline int qeth_get_elements_for_range(addr_t start, addr_t end)
{
- return PFN_UP(end - 1) - PFN_DOWN(start);
+ return PFN_UP(end) - PFN_DOWN(start);
}
static inline int qeth_get_micros(void)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-underestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152039349723452@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.