From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "s390/qeth: fix overestimated count of buffer elements" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 19:31:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520393497248106@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390/qeth: fix overestimated count of buffer elements
to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-qeth-fix-overestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Mar 6 19:02:57 PST 2018
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:58:12 +0100
Subject: s390/qeth: fix overestimated count of buffer elements
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 12472af89632beb1ed8dea29d4efe208ca05b06a ]
qeth_get_elements_for_range() doesn't know how to handle a 0-length
range (ie. start == end), and returns 1 when it should return 0.
Such ranges occur on TSO skbs, where the L2/L3/L4 headers (and thus all
of the skb's linear data) are skipped when mapping the skb into regular
buffer elements.
This overestimation may cause several performance-related issues:
1. sub-optimal IO buffer selection, where the next buffer gets selected
even though the skb would actually still fit into the current buffer.
2. forced linearization, if the element count for a non-linear skb
exceeds QETH_MAX_BUFFER_ELEMENTS.
Rather than modifying qeth_get_elements_for_range() and adding overhead
to every caller, fix up those callers that are in risk of passing a
0-length range.
Fixes: 2863c61334aa ("qeth: refactor calculation of SBALE count")
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 10 ++++++----
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 11 ++++++-----
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -3835,10 +3835,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qeth_get_elements_for_
int qeth_get_elements_no(struct qeth_card *card,
struct sk_buff *skb, int extra_elems, int data_offset)
{
- int elements = qeth_get_elements_for_range(
- (addr_t)skb->data + data_offset,
- (addr_t)skb->data + skb_headlen(skb)) +
- qeth_get_elements_for_frags(skb);
+ addr_t end = (addr_t)skb->data + skb_headlen(skb);
+ int elements = qeth_get_elements_for_frags(skb);
+ addr_t start = (addr_t)skb->data + data_offset;
+
+ if (start != end)
+ elements += qeth_get_elements_for_range(start, end);
if ((elements + extra_elems) > QETH_MAX_BUFFER_ELEMENTS(card)) {
QETH_DBF_MESSAGE(2, "Invalid size of IP packet "
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
@@ -2629,11 +2629,12 @@ static void qeth_tso_fill_header(struct
static int qeth_l3_get_elements_no_tso(struct qeth_card *card,
struct sk_buff *skb, int extra_elems)
{
- addr_t tcpdptr = (addr_t)tcp_hdr(skb) + tcp_hdrlen(skb);
- int elements = qeth_get_elements_for_range(
- tcpdptr,
- (addr_t)skb->data + skb_headlen(skb)) +
- qeth_get_elements_for_frags(skb);
+ addr_t start = (addr_t)tcp_hdr(skb) + tcp_hdrlen(skb);
+ addr_t end = (addr_t)skb->data + skb_headlen(skb);
+ int elements = qeth_get_elements_for_frags(skb);
+
+ if (start != end)
+ elements += qeth_get_elements_for_range(start, end);
if ((elements + extra_elems) > QETH_MAX_BUFFER_ELEMENTS(card)) {
QETH_DBF_MESSAGE(2,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-setip-command-handling.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-ip-address-lookup-for-l3-devices.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-ipa-command-submission-race.patch
queue-4.15/revert-s390-qeth-fix-using-of-ref-counter-for-rxip-addresses.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-overestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-double-free-on-ip-add-remove-race.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-ip-removal-on-offline-cards.patch
queue-4.15/s390-qeth-fix-underestimated-count-of-buffer-elements.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1520393497248106@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.