From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, dennisszhou@gmail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "bpf: fix mlock precharge on arraymaps" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:21:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520634101174215@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56632230ccbd31f06f33af4c6ac9fcbc88506825.1520521792.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
bpf: fix mlock precharge on arraymaps
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
bpf-fix-mlock-precharge-on-arraymaps.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Fri Mar 9 14:20:51 PST 2018
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 16:17:33 +0100
Subject: bpf: fix mlock precharge on arraymaps
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, stable@vger.kernel.org, Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56632230ccbd31f06f33af4c6ac9fcbc88506825.1520521792.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
[ upstream commit 9c2d63b843a5c8a8d0559cc067b5398aa5ec3ffc ]
syzkaller recently triggered OOM during percpu map allocation;
while there is work in progress by Dennis Zhou to add __GFP_NORETRY
semantics for percpu allocator under pressure, there seems also a
missing bpf_map_precharge_memlock() check in array map allocation.
Given today the actual bpf_map_charge_memlock() happens after the
find_and_alloc_map() in syscall path, the bpf_map_precharge_memlock()
is there to bail out early before we go and do the map setup work
when we find that we hit the limits anyway. Therefore add this for
array map as well.
Fixes: 6c9059817432 ("bpf: pre-allocate hash map elements")
Fixes: a10423b87a7e ("bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY map")
Reported-by: syzbot+adb03f3f0bb57ce3acda@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -48,8 +48,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(u
bool percpu = attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY;
u32 elem_size, index_mask, max_entries;
bool unpriv = !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
+ u64 cost, array_size, mask64;
struct bpf_array *array;
- u64 array_size, mask64;
+ int ret;
/* check sanity of attributes */
if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->key_size != 4 ||
@@ -92,8 +93,19 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(u
array_size += (u64) max_entries * elem_size;
/* make sure there is no u32 overflow later in round_up() */
- if (array_size >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
+ cost = array_size;
+ if (cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ if (percpu) {
+ cost += (u64)attr->max_entries * elem_size * num_possible_cpus();
+ if (cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ }
+ cost = round_up(cost, PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ ret = bpf_map_precharge_memlock(cost);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
/* allocate all map elements and zero-initialize them */
array = bpf_map_area_alloc(array_size);
@@ -108,20 +120,15 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(u
array->map.value_size = attr->value_size;
array->map.max_entries = attr->max_entries;
array->map.map_flags = attr->map_flags;
+ array->map.pages = cost;
array->elem_size = elem_size;
- if (!percpu)
- goto out;
-
- array_size += (u64) attr->max_entries * elem_size * num_possible_cpus();
-
- if (array_size >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE ||
- elem_size > PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE || bpf_array_alloc_percpu(array)) {
+ if (percpu &&
+ (elem_size > PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE ||
+ bpf_array_alloc_percpu(array))) {
bpf_map_area_free(array);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
-out:
- array->map.pages = round_up(array_size, PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
return &array->map;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daniel@iogearbox.net are
queue-4.9/bpf-fix-mlock-precharge-on-arraymaps.patch
queue-4.9/bpf-x64-implement-retpoline-for-tail-call.patch
queue-4.9/bpf-arm64-fix-out-of-bounds-access-in-tail-call.patch
queue-4.9/bpf-fix-wrong-exposure-of-map_flags-into-fdinfo-for-lpm.patch
queue-4.9/bpf-ppc64-fix-out-of-bounds-access-in-tail-call.patch
queue-4.9/bpf-add-schedule-points-in-percpu-arrays-management.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-09 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-08 15:17 [PATCH stable 4.9 0/6] BPF stable patches Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-08 15:17 ` [PATCH stable 4.9 1/6] bpf: fix wrong exposure of map_flags into fdinfo for lpm Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-09 22:21 ` Patch "bpf: fix wrong exposure of map_flags into fdinfo for lpm" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-08 15:17 ` [PATCH stable 4.9 2/6] bpf: fix mlock precharge on arraymaps Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-09 22:21 ` gregkh [this message]
2018-03-08 15:17 ` [PATCH stable 4.9 3/6] bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-09 22:21 ` Patch "bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-10 0:05 ` Patch "bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-08 15:17 ` [PATCH stable 4.9 4/6] bpf, arm64: fix out of bounds access in tail call Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-09 22:21 ` Patch "bpf, arm64: fix out of bounds access in tail call" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-08 15:17 ` [PATCH stable 4.9 5/6] bpf: add schedule points in percpu arrays management Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-09 22:21 ` Patch "bpf: add schedule points in percpu arrays management" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-08 15:17 ` [PATCH stable 4.9 6/6] bpf, ppc64: fix out of bounds access in tail call Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-09 22:21 ` Patch "bpf, ppc64: fix out of bounds access in tail call" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-09 22:22 ` [PATCH stable 4.9 0/6] BPF stable patches Greg KH
2018-03-09 22:36 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-10 0:03 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1520634101174215@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dennisszhou@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.