From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Update watermark state correctly in" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:40:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152085845825155@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 556fe36d09da5f82879e92bafa0371b4b79f7d6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:34:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Update watermark state correctly in
sanitize_watermarks
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
We no longer use intel_crtc->wm.active for watermarks any more,
which was incorrect. But this uncovered a bug in sanitize_watermarks(),
which meant that we wrote the correct watermarks, but the next
update would still use the wrong hw watermarks for calculating.
This caused all further updates to fail with -EINVAL and the
log would reveal an error like the one below:
[ 10.043902] [drm:ilk_validate_wm_level.part.8 [i915]] Sprite WM0 too large 56 (max 0)
[ 10.043960] [drm:ilk_validate_pipe_wm [i915]] LP0 watermark invalid
[ 10.044030] [drm:intel_crtc_atomic_check [i915]] No valid intermediate pipe watermarks are possible
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: b6b178a77210 ("drm/i915: Calculate ironlake intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.8+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171110113503.16253-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 5c7540f3f5dc..63c8b9ccb31e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -14443,6 +14443,8 @@ static void sanitize_watermarks(struct drm_device *dev)
cs->wm.need_postvbl_update = true;
dev_priv->display.optimize_watermarks(intel_state, cs);
+
+ to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state)->wm = cs->wm;
}
put_state:
reply other threads:[~2018-03-12 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152085845825155@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.