From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
dwmw2@infradead.org, dwmw@amazon.co.uk,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "objtool: Add retpoline validation" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:13:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520928788253221@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
objtool: Add retpoline validation
to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
objtool-add-retpoline-validation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From b5bc2231b8ad4387c9641f235ca0ad8cd300b6df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:24:06 +0100
Subject: objtool: Add retpoline validation
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
commit b5bc2231b8ad4387c9641f235ca0ad8cd300b6df upstream.
David requested a objtool validation pass for CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y enabled
builds, where it validates no unannotated indirect jumps or calls are
left.
Add an additional .discard.retpoline_safe section to allow annotating
the few indirect sites that are required and safe.
Requested-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
scripts/Makefile.build | 4 +
tools/objtool/builtin-check.c | 3 -
tools/objtool/builtin.h | 2
tools/objtool/check.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
tools/objtool/check.h | 1
5 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/scripts/Makefile.build
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.build
@@ -264,6 +264,10 @@ objtool_args += --no-unreachable
else
objtool_args += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0405, --no-unreachable)
endif
+ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
+ objtool_args += --retpoline
+endif
+
ifdef CONFIG_MODVERSIONS
objtool_o = $(@D)/.tmp_$(@F)
--- a/tools/objtool/builtin-check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/builtin-check.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
#include "builtin.h"
#include "check.h"
-bool no_fp, no_unreachable;
+bool no_fp, no_unreachable, retpoline;
static const char * const check_usage[] = {
"objtool check [<options>] file.o",
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static const char * const check_usage[]
const struct option check_options[] = {
OPT_BOOLEAN('f', "no-fp", &no_fp, "Skip frame pointer validation"),
OPT_BOOLEAN('u', "no-unreachable", &no_unreachable, "Skip 'unreachable instruction' warnings"),
+ OPT_BOOLEAN('r', "retpoline", &retpoline, "Validate retpoline assumptions"),
OPT_END(),
};
--- a/tools/objtool/builtin.h
+++ b/tools/objtool/builtin.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#include <subcmd/parse-options.h>
extern const struct option check_options[];
-extern bool no_fp, no_unreachable;
+extern bool no_fp, no_unreachable, retpoline;
extern int cmd_check(int argc, const char **argv);
extern int cmd_orc(int argc, const char **argv);
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ static int add_jump_destinations(struct
* disguise, so convert them accordingly.
*/
insn->type = INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC;
+ insn->retpoline_safe = true;
continue;
} else {
/* sibling call */
@@ -547,7 +548,8 @@ static int add_call_destinations(struct
if (!insn->call_dest && !insn->ignore) {
WARN_FUNC("unsupported intra-function call",
insn->sec, insn->offset);
- WARN("If this is a retpoline, please patch it in with alternatives and annotate it with ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE.");
+ if (retpoline)
+ WARN("If this is a retpoline, please patch it in with alternatives and annotate it with ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE.");
return -1;
}
@@ -1107,6 +1109,54 @@ static int read_unwind_hints(struct objt
return 0;
}
+static int read_retpoline_hints(struct objtool_file *file)
+{
+ struct section *sec, *relasec;
+ struct instruction *insn;
+ struct rela *rela;
+ int i;
+
+ sec = find_section_by_name(file->elf, ".discard.retpoline_safe");
+ if (!sec)
+ return 0;
+
+ relasec = sec->rela;
+ if (!relasec) {
+ WARN("missing .rela.discard.retpoline_safe section");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (sec->len % sizeof(unsigned long)) {
+ WARN("retpoline_safe size mismatch: %d %ld", sec->len, sizeof(unsigned long));
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < sec->len / sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
+ rela = find_rela_by_dest(sec, i * sizeof(unsigned long));
+ if (!rela) {
+ WARN("can't find rela for retpoline_safe[%d]", i);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ insn = find_insn(file, rela->sym->sec, rela->addend);
+ if (!insn) {
+ WARN("can't find insn for retpoline_safe[%d]", i);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC &&
+ insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC) {
+ WARN_FUNC("retpoline_safe hint not a indirect jump/call",
+ insn->sec, insn->offset);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ insn->retpoline_safe = true;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int decode_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
{
int ret;
@@ -1145,6 +1195,10 @@ static int decode_sections(struct objtoo
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = read_retpoline_hints(file);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1890,6 +1944,29 @@ static int validate_unwind_hints(struct
return warnings;
}
+static int validate_retpoline(struct objtool_file *file)
+{
+ struct instruction *insn;
+ int warnings = 0;
+
+ for_each_insn(file, insn) {
+ if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC &&
+ insn->type != INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC)
+ continue;
+
+ if (insn->retpoline_safe)
+ continue;
+
+ WARN_FUNC("indirect %s found in RETPOLINE build",
+ insn->sec, insn->offset,
+ insn->type == INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC ? "jump" : "call");
+
+ warnings++;
+ }
+
+ return warnings;
+}
+
static bool is_kasan_insn(struct instruction *insn)
{
return (insn->type == INSN_CALL &&
@@ -2050,6 +2127,13 @@ int check(const char *_objname, bool orc
if (list_empty(&file.insn_list))
goto out;
+ if (retpoline) {
+ ret = validate_retpoline(&file);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ warnings += ret;
+ }
+
ret = validate_functions(&file);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
--- a/tools/objtool/check.h
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct instruction {
unsigned char type;
unsigned long immediate;
bool alt_group, visited, dead_end, ignore, hint, save, restore, ignore_alts;
+ bool retpoline_safe;
struct symbol *call_dest;
struct instruction *jump_dest;
struct instruction *first_jump_src;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from peterz@infradead.org are
queue-4.15/x86-kprobes-fix-kernel-crash-when-probing-.entry_trampoline-code.patch
queue-4.15/objtool-fix-32-bit-build.patch
queue-4.15/x86-boot-objtool-annotate-indirect-jump-in-secondary_startup_64.patch
queue-4.15/objtool-add-module-specific-retpoline-rules.patch
queue-4.15/x86-retpoline-support-retpoline-builds-with-clang.patch
queue-4.15/x86-ldt-avoid-warning-in-32-bit-builds-with-older-gcc.patch
queue-4.15/x86-entry-reduce-the-code-footprint-of-the-idtentry-macro.patch
queue-4.15/objtool-retpolines-integrate-objtool-with-retpoline-support-more-closely.patch
queue-4.15/bug-use-pb-in-bug-and-stack-protector-failure.patch
queue-4.15/revert-x86-retpoline-simplify-vmexit_fill_rsb.patch
queue-4.15/nospec-include-asm-barrier.h-dependency.patch
queue-4.15/x86-mm-remove-stale-comment-about-kmemcheck.patch
queue-4.15/objtool-add-retpoline-validation.patch
queue-4.15/x86-mm-sme-objtool-annotate-indirect-call-in-sme_encrypt_execute.patch
queue-4.15/x86-speculation-use-ibrs-if-available-before-calling-into-firmware.patch
queue-4.15/x86-asm-improve-how-gen_-_suffixed_rmwcc-specify-clobbers.patch
queue-4.15/x86-64-realmode-add-instruction-suffix.patch
queue-4.15/objtool-fix-another-switch-table-detection-issue.patch
queue-4.15/x86-speculation-move-firmware_restrict_branch_speculation_-from-c-to-cpp.patch
queue-4.15/x86-speculation-objtool-annotate-indirect-calls-jumps-for-objtool.patch
queue-4.15/x86-paravirt-objtool-annotate-indirect-calls.patch
queue-4.15/objtool-use-existing-global-variables-for-options.patch
queue-4.15/x86-entry-64-use-xorl-for-faster-register-clearing.patch
queue-4.15/nospec-kill-array_index_nospec_mask_check.patch
queue-4.15/lib-bug.c-exclude-non-bug-warn-exceptions-from-report_bug.patch
queue-4.15/x86-io-apic-avoid-warning-in-32-bit-builds.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-13 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1520928788253221@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.