From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: nborisov@suse.com, dsterba@suse.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "btrfs: Fix memory barriers usage with device stats counters" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:03:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152147538173111@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
btrfs: Fix memory barriers usage with device stats counters
to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
btrfs-fix-memory-barriers-usage-with-device-stats-counters.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 9deae9689231964972a94bb56a79b669f9d47ac1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:47:37 +0300
Subject: btrfs: Fix memory barriers usage with device stats counters
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
commit 9deae9689231964972a94bb56a79b669f9d47ac1 upstream.
Commit addc3fa74e5b ("Btrfs: Fix the problem that the dirty flag of dev
stats is cleared") reworked the way device stats changes are tracked. A
new atomic dev_stats_ccnt counter was introduced which is incremented
every time any of the device stats counters are changed. This serves as
a flag whether there are any pending stats changes. However, this patch
only partially implemented the correct memory barriers necessary:
- It only ordered the stores to the counters but not the reads e.g.
btrfs_run_dev_stats
- It completely omitted any comments documenting the intended design and
how the memory barriers pair with each-other
This patch provides the necessary comments as well as adds a missing
smp_rmb in btrfs_run_dev_stats. Furthermore since dev_stats_cnt is only
a snapshot at best there was no point in reading the counter twice -
once in btrfs_dev_stats_dirty and then again when assigning stats_cnt.
Just collapse both reads into 1.
Fixes: addc3fa74e5b ("Btrfs: Fix the problem that the dirty flag of dev stats is cleared")
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -7093,10 +7093,24 @@ int btrfs_run_dev_stats(struct btrfs_tra
mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
- if (!device->dev_stats_valid || !btrfs_dev_stats_dirty(device))
+ stats_cnt = atomic_read(&device->dev_stats_ccnt);
+ if (!device->dev_stats_valid || stats_cnt == 0)
continue;
- stats_cnt = atomic_read(&device->dev_stats_ccnt);
+
+ /*
+ * There is a LOAD-LOAD control dependency between the value of
+ * dev_stats_ccnt and updating the on-disk values which requires
+ * reading the in-memory counters. Such control dependencies
+ * require explicit read memory barriers.
+ *
+ * This memory barriers pairs with smp_mb__before_atomic in
+ * btrfs_dev_stat_inc/btrfs_dev_stat_set and with the full
+ * barrier implied by atomic_xchg in
+ * btrfs_dev_stats_read_and_reset
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
+
ret = update_dev_stat_item(trans, fs_info, device);
if (!ret)
atomic_sub(stats_cnt, &device->dev_stats_ccnt);
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -498,6 +498,12 @@ static inline void btrfs_dev_stat_inc(st
int index)
{
atomic_inc(dev->dev_stat_values + index);
+ /*
+ * This memory barrier orders stores updating statistics before stores
+ * updating dev_stats_ccnt.
+ *
+ * It pairs with smp_rmb() in btrfs_run_dev_stats().
+ */
smp_mb__before_atomic();
atomic_inc(&dev->dev_stats_ccnt);
}
@@ -523,6 +529,12 @@ static inline void btrfs_dev_stat_set(st
int index, unsigned long val)
{
atomic_set(dev->dev_stat_values + index, val);
+ /*
+ * This memory barrier orders stores updating statistics before stores
+ * updating dev_stats_ccnt.
+ *
+ * It pairs with smp_rmb() in btrfs_run_dev_stats().
+ */
smp_mb__before_atomic();
atomic_inc(&dev->dev_stats_ccnt);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from nborisov@suse.com are
queue-4.15/btrfs-fix-memory-barriers-usage-with-device-stats-counters.patch
queue-4.15/btrfs-fix-use-after-free-when-cleaning-up-fs_devs-with-a-single-stale-device.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-19 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152147538173111@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.