All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org, dsterba@suse.com,
	enadolski@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "btrfs: remove spurious WARN_ON(ref->count < 0) in find_parent_nodes" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:03:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152147539124350@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    btrfs: remove spurious WARN_ON(ref->count < 0) in find_parent_nodes

to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     btrfs-remove-spurious-warn_on-ref-count-0-in-find_parent_nodes.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From c8195a7b1ad5648857ce20ba24f384faed8512bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:22:09 -0500
Subject: btrfs: remove spurious WARN_ON(ref->count < 0) in find_parent_nodes

From: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>

commit c8195a7b1ad5648857ce20ba24f384faed8512bc upstream.

Until v4.14, this warning was very infrequent:

	WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18172 at fs/btrfs/backref.c:1391 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
	Modules linked in: [...]
	CPU: 3 PID: 18172 Comm: bees Tainted: G      D W    L  4.11.9-zb64+ #1
	Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M5A78L-M/USB3, BIOS 2101    12/02/2014
	Call Trace:
	 dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
	 __warn+0xd1/0xf0
	 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
	 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
	 __btrfs_find_all_roots+0xad/0x120
	 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
	 iterate_extent_inodes+0x168/0x300
	 iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
	 ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
	 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x8ac/0x2820
	 ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x200
	 do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x700
	 ? __fget+0x112/0x200
	 SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
	 ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x140

Starting with v4.14 (specifically 86d5f9944252 ("btrfs: convert prelimary
reference tracking to use rbtrees")) the WARN_ON occurs three orders of
magnitude more frequently--almost once per second while running workloads
like bees.

Replace the WARN_ON() with a comment rationale for its removal.
The rationale is paraphrased from an explanation by Edmund Nadolski
<enadolski@suse.de> on the linux-btrfs mailing list.

Fixes: 8da6d5815c59 ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()")
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/backref.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -1263,7 +1263,16 @@ again:
 	while (node) {
 		ref = rb_entry(node, struct prelim_ref, rbnode);
 		node = rb_next(&ref->rbnode);
-		WARN_ON(ref->count < 0);
+		/*
+		 * ref->count < 0 can happen here if there are delayed
+		 * refs with a node->action of BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF.
+		 * prelim_ref_insert() relies on this when merging
+		 * identical refs to keep the overall count correct.
+		 * prelim_ref_insert() will merge only those refs
+		 * which compare identically.  Any refs having
+		 * e.g. different offsets would not be merged,
+		 * and would retain their original ref->count < 0.
+		 */
 		if (roots && ref->count && ref->root_id && ref->parent == 0) {
 			if (sc && sc->root_objectid &&
 			    ref->root_id != sc->root_objectid) {


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org are

queue-4.15/btrfs-remove-spurious-warn_on-ref-count-0-in-find_parent_nodes.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-03-19 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152147539124350@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=enadolski@suse.de \
    --cc=lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.