All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>,
	Mac Chiang <mac.chiang@intel.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.co.uk>,
	kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98357a: Fix speaker pop when starting playback
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:01:32 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521723692.1890.1.camel@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180322015456.GZ2186@sirena.org.uk>

Hi Mark,

Thanks for reviewing this so quickly.

On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 09:54 +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 07:30:15PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> 
> > +- sdmode-delay : specify a delay time for SD_MODE pin. According
> > +        to the DAC datasheet, if LRCLK is removed while BCLK is
> > present,
> > +        the DAC output can cause loud pop/crack noises. This
> > property
> > +        specifies a delay for the SD_MODE pin assert, required to
> > +        eliminate the noise.
> 
> Why is this configurable?  This sounds like something entirely within
> the digital domain of the device rather than something that depends
> on
> board configuration and it's hard to see how someone would configure
> this.
> 

The amount of delay needed seems specific to the CPU DAI,
not specific to the DAC. The CPU DAIs or the machine 
could specify this as a parameter, but I can't don't see how.

Perhaps it could be a driver parameter?

> > +static void max98357a_enable_sdmode_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > +   struct max98357a_priv *max98357a = container_of(work,
> > +           struct max98357a_priv, enable_sdmode_work.work);
> > +   unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +   spin_lock_irqsave(&max98357a->sdmode_lock, flags);
> > +   gpiod_set_value(max98357a->sdmode, max98357a-
> > >sdmode_enabled);
> > +   spin_unlock_irqrestore(&max98357a->sdmode_lock, flags);
> > +}
> 
> What is this lock supposed to accomplish?  We perform a single action
> under the lock which itself has internal locking, it's not going to
> have
> any meaningful effect.

I am under the impression it removes the race condition
between the gpiod_set_value() happening in the different
contexts.

Thanks,
Eze

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-22 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-21 22:30 [PATCH] ASoC: max98357a: Fix speaker pop when starting playback Ezequiel Garcia
2018-03-22  1:54 ` Mark Brown
2018-03-22  4:00   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-03-22 13:01   ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2018-03-27 11:36     ` Mark Brown
2018-03-27 18:11       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-03-27 21:57       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-04-16 18:06         ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1521723692.1890.1.camel@collabora.com \
    --to=ezequiel@collabora.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ezequiel@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=mac.chiang@intel.com \
    --cc=smbarber@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.