All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com,
	alexander.levin@microsoft.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "rtc: ac100: Fix multiple race conditions" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:31:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152172547599172@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    rtc: ac100: Fix multiple race conditions

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     rtc-ac100-fix-multiple-race-conditions.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Thu Mar 22 14:26:48 CET 2018
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:58:33 +0100
Subject: rtc: ac100: Fix multiple race conditions

From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>


[ Upstream commit 994ec64c0a193940be7a6fd074668b9446d3b6c3 ]

The probe function is not allowed to fail after registering the RTC because
the following may happen:

CPU0:                                CPU1:
sys_load_module()
 do_init_module()
  do_one_initcall()
   cmos_do_probe()
    rtc_device_register()
     __register_chrdev()
     cdev->owner = struct module*
                                     open("/dev/rtc0")
    rtc_device_unregister()
  module_put()
  free_module()
   module_free(mod->module_core)
   /* struct module *module is now
      freed */
                                      chrdev_open()
                                       spin_lock(cdev_lock)
                                       cdev_get()
                                        try_module_get()
                                         module_is_live()
                                         /* dereferences already
                                            freed struct module* */

Also, the interrupt handler: ac100_rtc_irq() is dereferencing chip->rtc but
this may still be NULL when it is called, resulting in:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000194
pgd = (ptrval)
[00000194] *pgd=00000000
Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 72 Comm: irq/71-ac100-rt Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1-next-20171201-dirty #120
Hardware name: Allwinner sun8i Family
task: (ptrval) task.stack: (ptrval)
PC is at mutex_lock+0x14/0x3c
LR is at ac100_rtc_irq+0x38/0xc8
pc : [<c06543a4>]    lr : [<c04d9a2c>]    psr: 60000053
sp : ee9c9f28  ip : 00000000  fp : ee9adfdc
r10: 00000000  r9 : c0a04c48  r8 : c015ed18
r7 : ee9bd600  r6 : ee9c9f28  r5 : ee9af590  r4 : c0a04c48
r3 : ef3cb3c0  r2 : 00000000  r1 : ee9af590  r0 : 00000194
Flags: nZCv  IRQs on  FIQs off  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM  Segment none
Control: 10c5387d  Table: 4000406a  DAC: 00000051
Process irq/71-ac100-rt (pid: 72, stack limit = 0x(ptrval))
Stack: (0xee9c9f28 to 0xee9ca000)
9f20:                   00000000 7c2fd1be c015ed18 ee9adf40 ee9c0400 ee9c0400
9f40: ee9adf40 c015ed34 ee9c8000 ee9adf64 ee9c0400 c015f040 ee9adf80 00000000
9f60: c015ee24 7c2fd1be ee9adfc0 ee9adf80 00000000 ee9c8000 ee9adf40 c015eef4
9f80: ef1eba34 c0138f14 ee9c8000 ee9adf80 c0138df4 00000000 00000000 00000000
9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 c01010e8 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 ffffffff ffffffff
[<c06543a4>] (mutex_lock) from [<c04d9a2c>] (ac100_rtc_irq+0x38/0xc8)
[<c04d9a2c>] (ac100_rtc_irq) from [<c015ed34>] (irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x54)
[<c015ed34>] (irq_thread_fn) from [<c015f040>] (irq_thread+0x14c/0x214)
[<c015f040>] (irq_thread) from [<c0138f14>] (kthread+0x120/0x150)
[<c0138f14>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)

Solve both issues by moving to
devm_rtc_allocate_device()/rtc_register_device()

Reported-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
Tested-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c |   19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c
@@ -567,6 +567,12 @@ static int ac100_rtc_probe(struct platfo
 		return chip->irq;
 	}
 
+	chip->rtc = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
+	if (IS_ERR(chip->rtc))
+		return PTR_ERR(chip->rtc);
+
+	chip->rtc->ops = &ac100_rtc_ops;
+
 	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, chip->irq, NULL,
 					ac100_rtc_irq,
 					IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT,
@@ -586,17 +592,16 @@ static int ac100_rtc_probe(struct platfo
 	/* clear counter alarm pending interrupts */
 	regmap_write(chip->regmap, AC100_ALM_INT_STA, AC100_ALM_INT_ENABLE);
 
-	chip->rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, "rtc-ac100",
-					     &ac100_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
-	if (IS_ERR(chip->rtc)) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to register device\n");
-		return PTR_ERR(chip->rtc);
-	}
-
 	ret = ac100_rtc_register_clks(chip);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = rtc_register_device(chip->rtc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to register device\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "RTC enabled\n");
 
 	return 0;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com are

queue-4.14/clk-at91-pmc-wait-for-clocks-when-resuming.patch
queue-4.14/rtc-ac100-fix-multiple-race-conditions.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-03-22 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152172547599172@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.