From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: neilb@suse.com, alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, snitzer@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "dm: ensure bio submission follows a depth-first tree walk" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:46:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152172641383136@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
dm: ensure bio submission follows a depth-first tree walk
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
dm-ensure-bio-submission-follows-a-depth-first-tree-walk.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Mar 22 14:40:24 CET 2018
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:43:28 +1000
Subject: dm: ensure bio submission follows a depth-first tree walk
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
[ Upstream commit 18a25da84354c6bb655320de6072c00eda6eb602 ]
A dm device can, in general, represent a tree of targets, each of which
handles a sub-range of the range of blocks handled by the parent.
The bio sequencing managed by generic_make_request() requires that bios
are generated and handled in a depth-first manner. Each call to a
make_request_fn() may submit bios to a single member device, and may
submit bios for a reduced region of the same device as the
make_request_fn.
In particular, any bios submitted to member devices must be expected to
be processed in order, so a later one must never wait for an earlier
one.
This ordering is usually achieved by using bio_split() to reduce a bio
to a size that can be completely handled by one target, and resubmitting
the remainder to the originating device. bio_queue_split() shows the
canonical approach.
dm doesn't follow this approach, largely because it has needed to split
bios since long before bio_split() was available. It currently can
submit bios to separate targets within the one dm_make_request() call.
Dependencies between these targets, as can happen with dm-snap, can
cause deadlocks if either bios gets stuck behind the other in the queues
managed by generic_make_request(). This requires the 'rescue'
functionality provided by dm_offload_{start,end}.
Some of this requirement can be removed by changing the order of bio
submission to follow the canonical approach. That is, if dm finds that
it needs to split a bio, the remainder should be sent to
generic_make_request() rather than being handled immediately. This
delays the handling until the first part is completely processed, so the
deadlock problems do not occur.
__split_and_process_bio() can be called both from dm_make_request() and
from dm_wq_work(). When called from dm_wq_work() the current approach
is perfectly satisfactory as each bio will be processed immediately.
When called from dm_make_request(), current->bio_list will be non-NULL,
and in this case it is best to create a separate "clone" bio for the
remainder.
When we use bio_clone_bioset() to split off the front part of a bio
and chain the two together and submit the remainder to
generic_make_request(), it is important that the newly allocated
bio is used as the head to be processed immediately, and the original
bio gets "bio_advance()"d and sent to generic_make_request() as the
remainder. Otherwise, if the newly allocated bio is used as the
remainder, and if it then needs to be split again, then the next
bio_clone_bioset() call will be made while holding a reference a bio
(result of the first clone) from the same bioset. This can potentially
exhaust the bioset mempool and result in a memory allocation deadlock.
Note that there is no race caused by reassigning cio.io->bio after already
calling __map_bio(). This bio will only be dereferenced again after
dec_pending() has found io->io_count to be zero, and this cannot happen
before the dec_pending() call at the end of __split_and_process_bio().
To provide the clone bio when splitting, we use q->bio_split. This
was previously being freed by bio-based dm to avoid having excess
rescuer threads. As bio_split bio sets no longer create rescuer
threads, there is little cost and much gain from restoring the
q->bio_split bio set.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/md/dm.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1320,8 +1320,29 @@ static void __split_and_process_bio(stru
} else {
ci.bio = bio;
ci.sector_count = bio_sectors(bio);
- while (ci.sector_count && !error)
+ while (ci.sector_count && !error) {
error = __split_and_process_non_flush(&ci);
+ if (current->bio_list && ci.sector_count && !error) {
+ /*
+ * Remainder must be passed to generic_make_request()
+ * so that it gets handled *after* bios already submitted
+ * have been completely processed.
+ * We take a clone of the original to store in
+ * ci.io->bio to be used by end_io_acct() and
+ * for dec_pending to use for completion handling.
+ * As this path is not used for REQ_OP_ZONE_REPORT,
+ * the usage of io->bio in dm_remap_zone_report()
+ * won't be affected by this reassignment.
+ */
+ struct bio *b = bio_clone_bioset(bio, GFP_NOIO,
+ md->queue->bio_split);
+ ci.io->bio = b;
+ bio_advance(bio, (bio_sectors(bio) - ci.sector_count) << 9);
+ bio_chain(b, bio);
+ generic_make_request(bio);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
}
/* drop the extra reference count */
@@ -1332,8 +1353,8 @@ static void __split_and_process_bio(stru
*---------------------------------------------------------------*/
/*
- * The request function that just remaps the bio built up by
- * dm_merge_bvec.
+ * The request function that remaps the bio to one target and
+ * splits off any remainder.
*/
static blk_qc_t dm_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
{
@@ -1854,12 +1875,6 @@ int dm_setup_md_queue(struct mapped_devi
case DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED:
dm_init_normal_md_queue(md);
blk_queue_make_request(md->queue, dm_make_request);
- /*
- * DM handles splitting bios as needed. Free the bio_split bioset
- * since it won't be used (saves 1 process per bio-based DM device).
- */
- bioset_free(md->queue->bio_split);
- md->queue->bio_split = NULL;
if (type == DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED)
queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DAX, md->queue);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from neilb@suse.com are
queue-4.9/dm-ensure-bio-submission-follows-a-depth-first-tree-walk.patch
queue-4.9/md-raid10-wait-up-frozen-array-in-handle_write_completed.patch
queue-4.9/nfs-don-t-try-to-cross-a-mountpount-when-there-isn-t-one-there.patch
queue-4.9/md-raid10-skip-spare-disk-as-first-disk.patch
next reply other threads:[~2018-03-22 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-22 13:46 gregkh [this message]
2018-03-22 13:48 ` Patch "dm: ensure bio submission follows a depth-first tree walk" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree Mike Snitzer
2018-03-22 14:01 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152172641383136@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.