From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: vkuznets@redhat.com, alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jgross@suse.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/xen: split xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu()" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:51:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152172668511311@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/xen: split xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-xen-split-xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Mar 22 14:40:24 CET 2018
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:35:43 +0100
Subject: x86/xen: split xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu()
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit a2d1078a35f9a38ae888aa6147e4ca32666154a1 ]
Split xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu() into xen_pv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu() and
xen_hvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu() to support further splitting of smp.c.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
@@ -299,35 +299,46 @@ static void __init xen_filter_cpu_maps(v
}
-static void __init xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
+static void __init xen_pv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
{
BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu();
- if (xen_pv_domain()) {
- if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_writable_page_tables))
- /* We've switched to the "real" per-cpu gdt, so make
- * sure the old memory can be recycled. */
- make_lowmem_page_readwrite(xen_initial_gdt);
+ if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_writable_page_tables))
+ /* We've switched to the "real" per-cpu gdt, so make
+ * sure the old memory can be recycled. */
+ make_lowmem_page_readwrite(xen_initial_gdt);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
- /*
- * Xen starts us with XEN_FLAT_RING1_DS, but linux code
- * expects __USER_DS
- */
- loadsegment(ds, __USER_DS);
- loadsegment(es, __USER_DS);
+ /*
+ * Xen starts us with XEN_FLAT_RING1_DS, but linux code
+ * expects __USER_DS
+ */
+ loadsegment(ds, __USER_DS);
+ loadsegment(es, __USER_DS);
#endif
- xen_filter_cpu_maps();
- xen_setup_vcpu_info_placement();
- }
+ xen_filter_cpu_maps();
+ xen_setup_vcpu_info_placement();
+
+ /*
+ * The alternative logic (which patches the unlock/lock) runs before
+ * the smp bootup up code is activated. Hence we need to set this up
+ * the core kernel is being patched. Otherwise we will have only
+ * modules patched but not core code.
+ */
+ xen_init_spinlocks();
+}
+
+static void __init xen_hvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
+{
+ BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
+ native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu();
/*
* Setup vcpu_info for boot CPU.
*/
- if (xen_hvm_domain())
- xen_vcpu_setup(0);
+ xen_vcpu_setup(0);
/*
* The alternative logic (which patches the unlock/lock) runs before
@@ -733,7 +744,7 @@ static irqreturn_t xen_irq_work_interrup
}
static const struct smp_ops xen_smp_ops __initconst = {
- .smp_prepare_boot_cpu = xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu,
+ .smp_prepare_boot_cpu = xen_pv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu,
.smp_prepare_cpus = xen_smp_prepare_cpus,
.smp_cpus_done = xen_smp_cpus_done,
@@ -772,5 +783,5 @@ void __init xen_hvm_smp_init(void)
smp_ops.cpu_die = xen_cpu_die;
smp_ops.send_call_func_ipi = xen_smp_send_call_function_ipi;
smp_ops.send_call_func_single_ipi = xen_smp_send_call_function_single_ipi;
- smp_ops.smp_prepare_boot_cpu = xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu;
+ smp_ops.smp_prepare_boot_cpu = xen_hvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vkuznets@redhat.com are
queue-4.9/x86-xen-split-xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-22 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152172668511311@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.