From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: fthain@telegraphics.com.au, alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
schmitzmic@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "scsi: mac_esp: Replace bogus memory barrier with spinlock" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:02:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15217273225234@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
scsi: mac_esp: Replace bogus memory barrier with spinlock
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
scsi-mac_esp-replace-bogus-memory-barrier-with-spinlock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Mar 22 14:57:32 CET 2018
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 17:08:05 +1000
Subject: scsi: mac_esp: Replace bogus memory barrier with spinlock
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
[ Upstream commit 4da2b1eb230ba4ad19b58984dc52e05b1073df5f ]
Commit da244654c66e ("[SCSI] mac_esp: fix for quadras with two esp
chips") added mac_scsi_esp_intr() to handle the IRQ lines from a pair of
on-board ESP chips (a normal shared IRQ did not work).
Proper mutual exclusion was missing from that patch. This patch fixes
race conditions between comparison and assignment of esp_chips[]
pointers.
Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Reviewed-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/mac_esp.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct mac_esp_priv {
int error;
};
static struct esp *esp_chips[2];
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(esp_chips_lock);
#define MAC_ESP_GET_PRIV(esp) ((struct mac_esp_priv *) \
platform_get_drvdata((struct platform_device *) \
@@ -562,15 +563,18 @@ static int esp_mac_probe(struct platform
}
host->irq = IRQ_MAC_SCSI;
- esp_chips[dev->id] = esp;
- mb();
- if (esp_chips[!dev->id] == NULL) {
- err = request_irq(host->irq, mac_scsi_esp_intr, 0, "ESP", NULL);
- if (err < 0) {
- esp_chips[dev->id] = NULL;
- goto fail_free_priv;
- }
+
+ /* The request_irq() call is intended to succeed for the first device
+ * and fail for the second device.
+ */
+ err = request_irq(host->irq, mac_scsi_esp_intr, 0, "ESP", NULL);
+ spin_lock(&esp_chips_lock);
+ if (err < 0 && esp_chips[!dev->id] == NULL) {
+ spin_unlock(&esp_chips_lock);
+ goto fail_free_priv;
}
+ esp_chips[dev->id] = esp;
+ spin_unlock(&esp_chips_lock);
err = scsi_esp_register(esp, &dev->dev);
if (err)
@@ -579,8 +583,13 @@ static int esp_mac_probe(struct platform
return 0;
fail_free_irq:
- if (esp_chips[!dev->id] == NULL)
+ spin_lock(&esp_chips_lock);
+ esp_chips[dev->id] = NULL;
+ if (esp_chips[!dev->id] == NULL) {
+ spin_unlock(&esp_chips_lock);
free_irq(host->irq, esp);
+ } else
+ spin_unlock(&esp_chips_lock);
fail_free_priv:
kfree(mep);
fail_free_command_block:
@@ -599,9 +608,13 @@ static int esp_mac_remove(struct platfor
scsi_esp_unregister(esp);
+ spin_lock(&esp_chips_lock);
esp_chips[dev->id] = NULL;
- if (!(esp_chips[0] || esp_chips[1]))
+ if (esp_chips[!dev->id] == NULL) {
+ spin_unlock(&esp_chips_lock);
free_irq(irq, NULL);
+ } else
+ spin_unlock(&esp_chips_lock);
kfree(mep);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from fthain@telegraphics.com.au are
queue-4.4/scsi-mac_esp-replace-bogus-memory-barrier-with-spinlock.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-22 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15217273225234@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.