Patch "RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Fix usage of user response structures in ABI file" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Fix usage of user response structures in ABI file

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     rdma-vmw_pvrdma-fix-usage-of-user-response-structures-in-abi-file.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 1f5a6c47aabc4606f91ad2e6ef71a1ff1924101c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:36:46 -0800
Subject: RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Fix usage of user response structures in ABI file

From: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com>

commit 1f5a6c47aabc4606f91ad2e6ef71a1ff1924101c upstream.

This ensures that we return the right structures back to userspace.
Otherwise, it looks like the reserved fields in the response structures
in userspace might have uninitialized data in them.

Fixes: 8b10ba783c9d ("RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Add shared receive queue support")
Fixes: 29c8d9eba550 ("IB: Add vmw_pvrdma driver")
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Tan <bryantan@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Aditya Sarwade <asarwade@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/vmw_pvrdma/pvrdma_cq.c    |    4 +++-
 drivers/infiniband/hw/vmw_pvrdma/pvrdma_verbs.c |    4 +++-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/vmw_pvrdma/pvrdma_cq.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/vmw_pvrdma/pvrdma_cq.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ struct ib_cq *pvrdma_create_cq(struct ib
 	union pvrdma_cmd_resp rsp;
 	struct pvrdma_cmd_create_cq *cmd = &req.create_cq;
 	struct pvrdma_cmd_create_cq_resp *resp = &rsp.create_cq_resp;
+	struct pvrdma_create_cq_resp cq_resp = {0};
 	struct pvrdma_create_cq ucmd;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct pvrdma_cqe) != 64);
@@ -198,6 +199,7 @@ struct ib_cq *pvrdma_create_cq(struct ib
 
 	cq->ibcq.cqe = resp->cqe;
 	cq->cq_handle = resp->cq_handle;
+	cq_resp.cqn = resp->cq_handle;
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->cq_tbl_lock, flags);
 	dev->cq_tbl[cq->cq_handle % dev->dsr->caps.max_cq] = cq;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->cq_tbl_lock, flags);
@@ -206,7 +208,7 @@ struct ib_cq *pvrdma_create_cq(struct ib
 		cq->uar = &(to_vucontext(context)->uar);
 
 		/* Copy udata back. */
-		if (ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &cq->cq_handle, sizeof(__u32))) {
+		if (ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &cq_resp, sizeof(cq_resp))) {
 			dev_warn(&dev->pdev->dev,
 				 "failed to copy back udata\n");
 			pvrdma_destroy_cq(&cq->ibcq);
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/vmw_pvrdma/pvrdma_verbs.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/vmw_pvrdma/pvrdma_verbs.c
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ struct ib_pd *pvrdma_alloc_pd(struct ib_
 	union pvrdma_cmd_resp rsp;
 	struct pvrdma_cmd_create_pd *cmd = &req.create_pd;
 	struct pvrdma_cmd_create_pd_resp *resp = &rsp.create_pd_resp;
+	struct pvrdma_alloc_pd_resp pd_resp = {0};
 	int ret;
 	void *ptr;
 
@@ -472,9 +473,10 @@ struct ib_pd *pvrdma_alloc_pd(struct ib_
 	pd->privileged = !context;
 	pd->pd_handle = resp->pd_handle;
 	pd->pdn = resp->pd_handle;
+	pd_resp.pdn = resp->pd_handle;
 
 	if (context) {
-		if (ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &pd->pdn, sizeof(__u32))) {
+		if (ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &pd_resp, sizeof(pd_resp))) {
 			dev_warn(&dev->pdev->dev,
 				 "failed to copy back protection domain\n");
 			pvrdma_dealloc_pd(&pd->ibpd);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from aditr@vmware.com are

queue-4.14/rdma-vmw_pvrdma-fix-usage-of-user-response-structures-in-abi-file.patch