All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1521755378.3848.295.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 841f13d..91f75f4 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 >  	}
 > 
 >  error:
-> +	pr_devel("<=%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
+> +	pr_devel("<==%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
 > +	return ret;
 > +}
 > +
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 > +				       view_content, ctx);
 > +
 >  	pkcs7_free_message(pkcs7);
->  	pr_devel("<=%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
+>  	pr_devel("<==%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
 >  	return ret;
 > diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c
 > index a6dcaa659aa8..456b803972b5 100644
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 > +	 * This function doesn't support messages with more than one signature,
 > +	 * so don't return anything in that case.
 > +	 */
-> +	if (pkcs7->signed_infos = NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)
+> +	if (pkcs7->signed_infos == NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)
 > +		return NULL;
 > +
 > +	return pkcs7->signed_infos->sig;
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 3744ece..62ca12c 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  "ref\020180316203837.10174-3-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v6 02/12] PKCS#7: Introduce pkcs7_get_message_sig() and verify_pkcs7_message_sig()\0"
- "Date\0Thu, 22 Mar 2018 21:49:38 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:49:38 -0400\0"
  "To\0Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>"
  " linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "Cc\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
  ">  \t}\n"
  "> \n"
  ">  error:\n"
- "> +\tpr_devel(\"<=%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
+ "> +\tpr_devel(\"<==%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
  "> +\treturn ret;\n"
  "> +}\n"
  "> +\n"
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
  "> +\t\t\t\t       view_content, ctx);\n"
  "> +\n"
  ">  \tpkcs7_free_message(pkcs7);\n"
- ">  \tpr_devel(\"<=%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
+ ">  \tpr_devel(\"<==%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
  ">  \treturn ret;\n"
  "> diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c\n"
  "> index a6dcaa659aa8..456b803972b5 100644\n"
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
  "> +\t * This function doesn't support messages with more than one signature,\n"
  "> +\t * so don't return anything in that case.\n"
  "> +\t */\n"
- "> +\tif (pkcs7->signed_infos = NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)\n"
+ "> +\tif (pkcs7->signed_infos == NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)\n"
  "> +\t\treturn NULL;\n"
  "> +\n"
  "> +\treturn pkcs7->signed_infos->sig;\n"
@@ -213,4 +213,4 @@
  ">  extern int verify_pefile_signature(const void *pebuf, unsigned pelen,\n"
  >
 
-e1eda017a9d64eea0cfa73351cf4bb18dff8e8a3b96d144496dcbeafcaab407c
+82c8d4bcfbf512b60af716deb221c33b126bc105610e8f4f2b648cffcf6c9dea

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 841f13d..e68f3c6 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 17:38 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
 > takes.
 
 The title "PKCS#7: refactor verify_pkcs7_signature()" might be more
-appropriate.  The patch description would then explain why it needs to
-be refactored.  In this case, verify_pkcs7_signature() verifies the
-signature using keys on the builtin and secondary keyrings.  IMA-
+appropriate.  The patch description would then explain why it needs to
+be refactored.  In this case, verify_pkcs7_signature() verifies the
+signature using keys on the builtin and secondary keyrings.  IMA-
 appraisal needs to verify the signature using keys on its keyring.
 
 The patch itself looks good!
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 >  	}
 > 
 >  error:
-> +	pr_devel("<=%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
+> +	pr_devel("<==%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
 > +	return ret;
 > +}
 > +
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 > +				       view_content, ctx);
 > +
 >  	pkcs7_free_message(pkcs7);
->  	pr_devel("<=%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
+>  	pr_devel("<==%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
 >  	return ret;
 > diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c
 > index a6dcaa659aa8..456b803972b5 100644
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 > +	 * This function doesn't support messages with more than one signature,
 > +	 * so don't return anything in that case.
 > +	 */
-> +	if (pkcs7->signed_infos = NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)
+> +	if (pkcs7->signed_infos == NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)
 > +		return NULL;
 > +
 > +	return pkcs7->signed_infos->sig;
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 3744ece..ae9da04 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  "ref\020180316203837.10174-3-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v6 02/12] PKCS#7: Introduce pkcs7_get_message_sig() and verify_pkcs7_message_sig()\0"
- "Date\0Thu, 22 Mar 2018 21:49:38 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:49:38 -0400\0"
  "To\0Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>"
  " linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "Cc\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@
  "> takes.\n"
  "\n"
  "The title \"PKCS#7: refactor verify_pkcs7_signature()\" might be more\n"
- "appropriate. \302\240The patch description would then explain why it needs to\n"
- "be refactored. \302\240In this case, verify_pkcs7_signature() verifies the\n"
- "signature using keys on the builtin and secondary keyrings. \302\240IMA-\n"
+ "appropriate.  The patch description would then explain why it needs to\n"
+ "be refactored.  In this case, verify_pkcs7_signature() verifies the\n"
+ "signature using keys on the builtin and secondary keyrings.  IMA-\n"
  "appraisal needs to verify the signature using keys on its keyring.\n"
  "\n"
  "The patch itself looks good!\n"
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
  ">  \t}\n"
  "> \n"
  ">  error:\n"
- "> +\tpr_devel(\"<=%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
+ "> +\tpr_devel(\"<==%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
  "> +\treturn ret;\n"
  "> +}\n"
  "> +\n"
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
  "> +\t\t\t\t       view_content, ctx);\n"
  "> +\n"
  ">  \tpkcs7_free_message(pkcs7);\n"
- ">  \tpr_devel(\"<=%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
+ ">  \tpr_devel(\"<==%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
  ">  \treturn ret;\n"
  "> diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c\n"
  "> index a6dcaa659aa8..456b803972b5 100644\n"
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
  "> +\t * This function doesn't support messages with more than one signature,\n"
  "> +\t * so don't return anything in that case.\n"
  "> +\t */\n"
- "> +\tif (pkcs7->signed_infos = NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)\n"
+ "> +\tif (pkcs7->signed_infos == NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)\n"
  "> +\t\treturn NULL;\n"
  "> +\n"
  "> +\treturn pkcs7->signed_infos->sig;\n"
@@ -213,4 +213,4 @@
  ">  extern int verify_pefile_signature(const void *pebuf, unsigned pelen,\n"
  >
 
-e1eda017a9d64eea0cfa73351cf4bb18dff8e8a3b96d144496dcbeafcaab407c
+9060a58d0282caf1a0fa3788d160edd6f8d58c6a7827fb5c64c87ed91c36c7ee

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index 841f13d..ec5ef1f 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 17:38 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
 > takes.
 
 The title "PKCS#7: refactor verify_pkcs7_signature()" might be more
-appropriate.  The patch description would then explain why it needs to
-be refactored.  In this case, verify_pkcs7_signature() verifies the
-signature using keys on the builtin and secondary keyrings.  IMA-
+appropriate. ?The patch description would then explain why it needs to
+be refactored. ?In this case, verify_pkcs7_signature() verifies the
+signature using keys on the builtin and secondary keyrings. ?IMA-
 appraisal needs to verify the signature using keys on its keyring.
 
 The patch itself looks good!
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 >  	}
 > 
 >  error:
-> +	pr_devel("<=%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
+> +	pr_devel("<==%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
 > +	return ret;
 > +}
 > +
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 > +				       view_content, ctx);
 > +
 >  	pkcs7_free_message(pkcs7);
->  	pr_devel("<=%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
+>  	pr_devel("<==%s() = %d\n", __func__, ret);
 >  	return ret;
 > diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c
 > index a6dcaa659aa8..456b803972b5 100644
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 > +	 * This function doesn't support messages with more than one signature,
 > +	 * so don't return anything in that case.
 > +	 */
-> +	if (pkcs7->signed_infos = NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)
+> +	if (pkcs7->signed_infos == NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)
 > +		return NULL;
 > +
 > +	return pkcs7->signed_infos->sig;
@@ -187,4 +187,9 @@ Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 > 
 >  #ifdef CONFIG_SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION
 >  extern int verify_pefile_signature(const void *pebuf, unsigned pelen,
->
+> 
+
+--
+To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
+the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
+More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index 3744ece..5fc5ff9 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -1,25 +1,9 @@
  "ref\020180316203837.10174-1-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "ref\020180316203837.10174-3-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
- "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v6 02/12] PKCS#7: Introduce pkcs7_get_message_sig() and verify_pkcs7_message_sig()\0"
- "Date\0Thu, 22 Mar 2018 21:49:38 +0000\0"
- "To\0Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>"
- " linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org\0"
- "Cc\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
-  keyrings@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
-  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
-  Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>
-  James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
-  Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
-  David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-  David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-  Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
-  Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-  David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-  AKASHI
- " Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>\0"
+ "From\0zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH v6 02/12] PKCS#7: Introduce pkcs7_get_message_sig() and verify_pkcs7_message_sig()\0"
+ "Date\0Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:49:38 -0400\0"
+ "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Hi Thiago,\n"
@@ -34,9 +18,9 @@
  "> takes.\n"
  "\n"
  "The title \"PKCS#7: refactor verify_pkcs7_signature()\" might be more\n"
- "appropriate. \302\240The patch description would then explain why it needs to\n"
- "be refactored. \302\240In this case, verify_pkcs7_signature() verifies the\n"
- "signature using keys on the builtin and secondary keyrings. \302\240IMA-\n"
+ "appropriate. ?The patch description would then explain why it needs to\n"
+ "be refactored. ?In this case, verify_pkcs7_signature() verifies the\n"
+ "signature using keys on the builtin and secondary keyrings. ?IMA-\n"
  "appraisal needs to verify the signature using keys on its keyring.\n"
  "\n"
  "The patch itself looks good!\n"
@@ -108,7 +92,7 @@
  ">  \t}\n"
  "> \n"
  ">  error:\n"
- "> +\tpr_devel(\"<=%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
+ "> +\tpr_devel(\"<==%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
  "> +\treturn ret;\n"
  "> +}\n"
  "> +\n"
@@ -144,7 +128,7 @@
  "> +\t\t\t\t       view_content, ctx);\n"
  "> +\n"
  ">  \tpkcs7_free_message(pkcs7);\n"
- ">  \tpr_devel(\"<=%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
+ ">  \tpr_devel(\"<==%s() = %d\\n\", __func__, ret);\n"
  ">  \treturn ret;\n"
  "> diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c\n"
  "> index a6dcaa659aa8..456b803972b5 100644\n"
@@ -165,7 +149,7 @@
  "> +\t * This function doesn't support messages with more than one signature,\n"
  "> +\t * so don't return anything in that case.\n"
  "> +\t */\n"
- "> +\tif (pkcs7->signed_infos = NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)\n"
+ "> +\tif (pkcs7->signed_infos == NULL || pkcs7->signed_infos->next != NULL)\n"
  "> +\t\treturn NULL;\n"
  "> +\n"
  "> +\treturn pkcs7->signed_infos->sig;\n"
@@ -211,6 +195,11 @@
  "> \n"
  ">  #ifdef CONFIG_SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION\n"
  ">  extern int verify_pefile_signature(const void *pebuf, unsigned pelen,\n"
- >
+ "> \n"
+ "\n"
+ "--\n"
+ "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n"
+ "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
+ More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
-e1eda017a9d64eea0cfa73351cf4bb18dff8e8a3b96d144496dcbeafcaab407c
+2fea04f5c434ce92214d3e83428deb85bc7afa16fe283c8ca6f996f28d232f40

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.