From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay0222.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.222]:49909 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750788AbeCYHzQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Mar 2018 03:55:16 -0400 Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by smtpgrave04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9F018010A63 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 07:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1521963970.24655.16.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] counter: Introduce the Generic Counter interface From: Joe Perches To: Jonathan Cameron , William Breathitt Gray Cc: knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, benjamin.gaignard@st.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 00:46:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180324173358.571e2fd8@archlinux> References: <20180324173358.571e2fd8@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2018-03-24 at 17:33 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > checkpatch.pl --strict (but take into account some of the warnings will > be silly so don't fix them all). What checkpatch output is silly?