From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1521997449.24655.22.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] counter: Introduce the Generic Counter interface From: Joe Perches To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: William Breathitt Gray , knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, benjamin.gaignard@st.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 10:04:09 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180325175624.4cdaaefe@archlinux> References: <20180324173358.571e2fd8@archlinux> <1521963970.24655.16.camel@perches.com> <20180325175624.4cdaaefe@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-ID: On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 17:56 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 00:46:10 -0700 > Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Sat, 2018-03-24 at 17:33 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > checkpatch.pl --strict (but take into account some of the warnings will > > > be silly so don't fix them all). > > > > What checkpatch output is silly? > > Sorry - bad word choice. No worries. Just checking. > It guides you to where you should look very > well, but sometimes the patch author should consider the warning and > decide to ignore it. Very true. It's a brainless tool and all who use it should seriously consider ignoring its output whenever they deem appropriate.