All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1522103487.3541.162.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 7340426..583bc60 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 16:57 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
 > (19f8a84713ed "ima: measure and appraise the IMA policy itself").
 
 If you can determine that writing the policy should fail and then
-detect that it actually did fail, the latter option is more complete. 
+detect that it actually did fail, the latter option is more complete. 
 
 > BTW load_policy() use old approach catting the content into sysfs policy file.
 > Maybe it'd be good to echo policy filename into sysfs policy file for kernel >
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ detect that it actually did fail, the latter option is more complete.
 
 Cat'ing the file doesn't work if the policy has to be signed. I
 haven't tried writing the policy pathname, when the file doesn't
-require it to be signed.  There's no reason that it wouldn't work.
+require it to be signed.  There's no reason that it wouldn't work.
 
 > * ima_measurement.sh,ima_violations.sh: Avoid using tmpfs filesystem [1]. You
 > suggested using RAM block device. Would it be ok to use filesystem created on
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 8824abd..4897bd8 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
  "ref\020180314155731.5943-1-pvorel@suse.cz\0"
  "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Rewrite tests into new API + fixes\0"
+ "Subject\0[LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Rewrite tests into new API + fixes\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:31:27 -0400\0"
- "To\0Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>"
- " ltp@lists.linux.it\0"
- "Cc\0linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "To\0ltp@lists.linux.it\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Hi Petr,\n"
@@ -40,7 +38,7 @@
  "> (19f8a84713ed \"ima: measure and appraise the IMA policy itself\").\n"
  "\n"
  "If you can determine that writing the policy should fail and then\n"
- "detect that it actually did fail, the latter option is more complete. \n"
+ "detect that it actually did fail, the latter option is more complete.\302\240\n"
  "\n"
  "> BTW load_policy() use old approach catting the content into sysfs policy file.\n"
  "> Maybe it'd be good to echo policy filename into sysfs policy file for kernel >\n"
@@ -48,7 +46,7 @@
  "\n"
  "Cat'ing the file doesn't work if the policy has to be signed. I\n"
  "haven't tried writing the policy pathname, when the file doesn't\n"
- "require it to be signed.  There's no reason that it wouldn't work.\n"
+ "require it to be signed. \302\240There's no reason that it wouldn't work.\n"
  "\n"
  "> * ima_measurement.sh,ima_violations.sh: Avoid using tmpfs filesystem [1]. You\n"
  "> suggested using RAM block device. Would it be ok to use filesystem created on\n"
@@ -122,4 +120,4 @@
  ">  mode change 100755 => 100644 testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh\n"
  >
 
-26bb7919e3be47c4c37d7c4569141c701b8cf5f302a8522f8b2b7ca6cf5bd2be
+b1bde822360ee07cab341b8253e8e00e2d6bc002e128d04d34f3f40d86aabf8b

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.