From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: songliubraving@fb.com, acme@redhat.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ephiepark@fb.com,
eranian@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jolsa@redhat.com,
kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
vincent.weaver@maine.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "perf/core: Fix ctx_event_type in ctx_resched()" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:50:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15221370518329@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
perf/core: Fix ctx_event_type in ctx_resched()
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
perf-core-fix-ctx_event_type-in-ctx_resched.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From bd903afeb504db5655a45bb4cf86f38be5b1bf62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 21:55:04 -0800
Subject: perf/core: Fix ctx_event_type in ctx_resched()
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
commit bd903afeb504db5655a45bb4cf86f38be5b1bf62 upstream.
In ctx_resched(), EVENT_FLEXIBLE should be sched_out when EVENT_PINNED is
added. However, ctx_resched() calculates ctx_event_type before checking
this condition. As a result, pinned events will NOT get higher priority
than flexible events.
The following shows this issue on an Intel CPU (where ref-cycles can
only use one hardware counter).
1. First start:
perf stat -C 0 -e ref-cycles -I 1000
2. Then, in the second console, run:
perf stat -C 0 -e ref-cycles:D -I 1000
The second perf uses pinned events, which is expected to have higher
priority. However, because it failed in ctx_resched(). It is never
run.
This patch fixes this by calculating ctx_event_type after re-evaluating
event_type.
Reported-by: Ephraim Park <ephiepark@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: <kernel-team@fb.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Fixes: 487f05e18aa4 ("perf/core: Optimize event rescheduling on active contexts")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180306055504.3283731-1-songliubraving@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2322,7 +2322,7 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_
struct perf_event_context *task_ctx,
enum event_type_t event_type)
{
- enum event_type_t ctx_event_type = event_type & EVENT_ALL;
+ enum event_type_t ctx_event_type;
bool cpu_event = !!(event_type & EVENT_CPU);
/*
@@ -2332,6 +2332,8 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_
if (event_type & EVENT_PINNED)
event_type |= EVENT_FLEXIBLE;
+ ctx_event_type = event_type & EVENT_ALL;
+
perf_pmu_disable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
if (task_ctx)
task_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, task_ctx, event_type);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from songliubraving@fb.com are
queue-4.14/perf-core-fix-ctx_event_type-in-ctx_resched.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-27 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15221370518329@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ephiepark@fb.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.