From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E02F8E00A1C; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:22:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (jpewhacker[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.214.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com (mail-it0-f65.google.com [209.85.214.65]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E6CE008D3 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-it0-f65.google.com with SMTP id z143-v6so16151727itc.0 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:22:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:subject:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=gBYrfNK5pTPuvdkJ2q2/OZIZHVLmvMdlLVAOJO23L8U=; b=gzBo9flTwjNbvzC3G2B1oVhR0vaO+/g//eiKZTDwzNR/aEf1TfTSYR2v2Nr6QBuLdd 2iw+Uhm9PlFzxJMVFeNDz40Ed/RDWFBktKpRzPIY4+TZx0DVf9y7bidMKn4e+kbkBoiR oJCuLx8jngEWxBK5wIlNi5Xmj6RBhmm+SPCdZUM5i3TXPfmUvE6XHZKHBJis6KO1Hovh fatCPm96JFUDzEAyWm+UPFls3M3aPqfI3zOxyVLE3/ag68fCKldAwhwR92mR9nSWTdLw TDw7RewLbkE3m/2WqMvm84/O9Ei1b3GyO89oqGAiVnfQSxSmcZbRHmFShbmvEdWpFdIr ijug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:subject:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=gBYrfNK5pTPuvdkJ2q2/OZIZHVLmvMdlLVAOJO23L8U=; b=eHWwLfg5hmuVwzqeMze+TcrRish8oqBX9WLZujvJmxpW/BVzgQfBiS0EGN4V1CyRpb mCyj98IEyXeFMfzNOPnphkzRCE1faqus/boGJHGoyfdT7tnmpD1dV7nbEYEcbYR31yHh +ySTHO1GQFAch2VaUWfDLkd4Pm42syHS9sjRzlgFpL1NjCLV31oAtQirWpcmbo2trRfM b3L3/2IjTDDsRqZ0/iZz/7DEVyX4Tmf1x/3OlAc+xAzuwpD/9uW2kMnJ7/9F6u/7NmJQ 5FZ2KadKHshP9fiAkORw0ERKVpdIctFDuv8pgkds+20NEdYWFyD1rBPQWU5M/Fx94VZ7 LKpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7HkKuKQO+/FEeJm/Ny1SFiIav0uZROa2EXZJdiIN/ETq2jw3vdP taK6y6hIypRc2YkJI6axWwo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtazQJJ0yYzQFNf8Lg9EtzIKAEiyvnjKrdJQqLhGzQxLG25MsuFenIswSNFAE37O3RHD8Cetw== X-Received: by 2002:a24:c184:: with SMTP id e126-v6mr27614095itg.98.1522160567145; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ola-842mrw1.ad.garmin.com ([204.77.163.55]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t134-v6sm1237275itt.43.2018.03.27.07.22.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:22:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Joshua Watt X-Google-Original-From: Joshua Watt Message-ID: <1522160565.3242.241.camel@gmail.com> To: pawanKumar Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:22:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1521820243.3242.187.camel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 (3.26.6-1.fc27) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Bitbake failure: X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:22:49 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-2P4Mk/KIdP9RmDLEjyqP" --=-2P4Mk/KIdP9RmDLEjyqP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:19 +0000, pawanKumar wrote: > Thanks for your tip.Can I use capital c in place of small c. Not quite sure what you mean. If you are trying to do: bitbake -C fetchall core-image-sato that doesn't work anymore AFAIK. I don't think there is currently a way to do a "force invalidate" (e.g. -f) with --runall, although TBH I'm not sure if 'bitbake -C fetchall' did that anyway. Perhaps someone more familiar with the recursive dependencies can chime in. However, I recently ran into a case where having -f apply to --runall was useful, so I have a patch in my contrib tree to add support for it. If that's what you're trying to do, I'm curious what the use case is? I haven't pushed the patch to the mailing list because I'm not sure if my use is actually valid. > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:20 PM Joshua Watt > wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 07:31 +0000, pawanKumar wrote: > > > Hi team,When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving > > > error as > > > "target do_fetchall is not found for image core-image-sato". > > > How to over come this error. > > > > I believe fetchall was superseded by --runall. Try: > > bitbake --runall fetch core-image-sato > > > Regards > > > Pavan. --=-2P4Mk/KIdP9RmDLEjyqP Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:19 +0000, pawanKumar= wrote:
Thanks for your t= ip.
Can I use capital c in place of small c.

Not quite sure what you mean. If you are try= ing to do:

bitbake -C fetchall core-image-sato

that doesn't work anymore AFAIK. I don't think there= is currently a way to do a "force invalidate" (e.g. -f) with --runall, alt= hough TBH I'm not sure if 'bitbake -C fetchall' did that anyway. Perhaps so= meone more familiar with the recursive dependencies can chime in. 

However, I recently ran into a case where having -f a= pply to --runall was useful, so I have a patch in my contrib tree to add su= pport for it. If that's what you're trying to do, I'm curious what the use = case is? I haven't pushed the patch to the mailing list because I'm not sur= e if my use is actually valid.


On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:= 20 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacker@gm= ail.com> wrote:
On Fri= , 2018-03-23 at 07:31 +0000, pawanKumar wrote:
Hi team,
When I tried to run (bitbat= e -c fetchall) it is giving error as
"target do_fetc= hall is not found for image core-image-sato". 
= How to over come this error.

I = believe fetchall was superseded by --runall. Try:

= bitbake --runall fetch core-image-sato


= Regards
Pavan.
--=-2P4Mk/KIdP9RmDLEjyqP--