All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw" <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>
To: "Dec, Katarzyna" <katarzyna.dec@intel.com>,
	"igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib: Move common gpgpu/media functions to gpu_fill library
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 14:17:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1522246672.3030.8.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327133648.30510-1-katarzyna.dec@intel.com>

On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 15:36 +0200, Katarzyna Dec wrote:
> Gpgpu_fill and media_fill libraries are very similar and many
> functions can be shared. I have created library gpu_fill with
> all functions needed for implementing gpgpu_fill and media_fill
> tests for all Gens. Duplicates, e.g. where only name was changed,
> were removed. The earliest common function remained.
> 

> -static void
> -gen8_emit_state_base_address(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch)
> -{
> -	OUT_BATCH(GEN8_STATE_BASE_ADDRESS | (16 - 2));
> -
> -	/* general */
> -	OUT_BATCH(0 | (0x78 << 4) | (0 << 1) |  BASE_ADDRESS_MODIFY);
> -	OUT_BATCH(0);
> -
Why did you choose 
> +	OUT_BATCH(0 | BASE_ADDRESS_MODIFY);

and not the one above? Does it make any difference which is used?

Radek

_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-28 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-27 13:36 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib: Move common gpgpu/media functions to gpu_fill library Katarzyna Dec
2018-03-27 13:36 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib: Adjust refactored gpu_fill library to our coding style Katarzyna Dec
2018-03-27 13:36 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2] lib/gpgpu_fill: Add missing configuration parameters for gpgpu_fill Katarzyna Dec
2018-03-27 23:52 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib: Move common gpgpu/media functions to gpu_fill library Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-03-28 13:32   ` Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw
2018-03-28 18:50     ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-04-04 13:25   ` Katarzyna Dec
2018-03-28 14:17 ` Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw [this message]
2018-04-04 13:20   ` Katarzyna Dec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1522246672.3030.8.camel@intel.com \
    --to=radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=katarzyna.dec@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.