From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: fw@strlen.de, edumazet@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
pablo@netfilter.org,
syzbot+bdabab6f1983a03fc009@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netfilter: bridge: ebt_among: add more missing match size checks" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:43:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152277382653112@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: bridge: ebt_among: add more missing match size checks
to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-bridge-ebt_among-add-more-missing-match-size-checks.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From c8d70a700a5b486bfa8e5a7d33d805389f6e59f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:27:31 +0100
Subject: netfilter: bridge: ebt_among: add more missing match size checks
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
commit c8d70a700a5b486bfa8e5a7d33d805389f6e59f9 upstream.
ebt_among is special, it has a dynamic match size and is exempt
from the central size checks.
commit c4585a2823edf ("bridge: ebt_among: add missing match size checks")
added validation for pool size, but missed fact that the macros
ebt_among_wh_src/dst can already return out-of-bound result because
they do not check value of wh_src/dst_ofs (an offset) vs. the size
of the match that userspace gave to us.
v2:
check that offset has correct alignment.
Paolo Abeni points out that we should also check that src/dst
wormhash arrays do not overlap, and src + length lines up with
start of dst (or vice versa).
v3: compact wormhash_sizes_valid() part
NB: Fixes tag is intentionally wrong, this bug exists from day
one when match was added for 2.6 kernel. Tag is there so stable
maintainers will notice this one too.
Tested with same rules from the earlier patch.
Fixes: c4585a2823edf ("bridge: ebt_among: add missing match size checks")
Reported-by: <syzbot+bdabab6f1983a03fc009@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_among.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_among.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_among.c
@@ -177,6 +177,28 @@ static bool poolsize_invalid(const struc
return w && w->poolsize >= (INT_MAX / sizeof(struct ebt_mac_wormhash_tuple));
}
+static bool wormhash_offset_invalid(int off, unsigned int len)
+{
+ if (off == 0) /* not present */
+ return false;
+
+ if (off < (int)sizeof(struct ebt_among_info) ||
+ off % __alignof__(struct ebt_mac_wormhash))
+ return true;
+
+ off += sizeof(struct ebt_mac_wormhash);
+
+ return off > len;
+}
+
+static bool wormhash_sizes_valid(const struct ebt_mac_wormhash *wh, int a, int b)
+{
+ if (a == 0)
+ a = sizeof(struct ebt_among_info);
+
+ return ebt_mac_wormhash_size(wh) + a == b;
+}
+
static int ebt_among_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
{
const struct ebt_among_info *info = par->matchinfo;
@@ -189,6 +211,10 @@ static int ebt_among_mt_check(const stru
if (expected_length > em->match_size)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (wormhash_offset_invalid(info->wh_dst_ofs, em->match_size) ||
+ wormhash_offset_invalid(info->wh_src_ofs, em->match_size))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
wh_dst = ebt_among_wh_dst(info);
if (poolsize_invalid(wh_dst))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -201,6 +227,14 @@ static int ebt_among_mt_check(const stru
if (poolsize_invalid(wh_src))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (info->wh_src_ofs < info->wh_dst_ofs) {
+ if (!wormhash_sizes_valid(wh_src, info->wh_src_ofs, info->wh_dst_ofs))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ if (!wormhash_sizes_valid(wh_dst, info->wh_dst_ofs, info->wh_src_ofs))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
expected_length += ebt_mac_wormhash_size(wh_src);
if (em->match_size != EBT_ALIGN(expected_length)) {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from fw@strlen.de are
queue-3.18/netfilter-x_tables-add-and-use-xt_check_proc_name.patch
queue-3.18/xfrm_user-uncoditionally-validate-esn-replay-attribute-struct.patch
queue-3.18/netfilter-bridge-ebt_among-add-more-missing-match-size-checks.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-04-03 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152277382653112@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+bdabab6f1983a03fc009@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.