All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: lukas@wunner.de, alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hdegoede@redhat.com,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, loic.poulain@linaro.org,
	marcel@holtmann.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Mandate presence of shutdown and device wake GPIO" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 11:36:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152326656861254@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Mandate presence of shutdown and device wake GPIO

to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bluetooth-hci_bcm-mandate-presence-of-shutdown-and-device-wake-gpio.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Mon Apr  9 10:16:32 CEST 2018
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:32:10 +0100
Subject: Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Mandate presence of shutdown and device wake GPIO

From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>


[ Upstream commit 3e81a4ca51a1172253078ca7abd6a91040b8fcf4 ]

Commit 0395ffc1ee05 ("Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add PM for BCM devices")
amended this driver to request a shutdown and device wake GPIO on probe,
but mandated that only one of them need to be present:

	/* Make sure at-least one of the GPIO is defined and that
	 * a name is specified for this instance
	 */
	if ((!dev->device_wakeup && !dev->shutdown) || !dev->name) {
		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid platform data\n");
		return -EINVAL;
	}

However the same commit added a call to bcm_gpio_set_power() to the
->probe hook, which unconditionally accesses *both* GPIOs.  Luckily,
the resulting NULL pointer deref was never reported, suggesting there's
no machine where either GPIO is missing.

Commit 8a92056837fd ("Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add (runtime)pm support to the
serdev driver") removed the check whether at least one of the GPIOs is
present without specifying a reason.

Because commit 62aaefa7d038 ("Bluetooth: hci_bcm: improve use of gpios
API") refactored the driver to use devm_gpiod_get_optional() instead of
devm_gpiod_get(), one is now tempted to believe that the driver doesn't
require *any* of the two GPIOs.

Which is wrong, the driver still requires both GPIOs to avoid a NULL
pointer deref.  To this end, establish the status quo ante and request
the GPIOs with devm_gpiod_get() again.  Bail out of ->probe if either
of them is missing.

Oddly enough, whereas bcm_gpio_set_power() accesses the device wake pin
unconditionally, bcm_suspend_device() and bcm_resume_device() do check
for its presence before accessing it.  Those checks are superfluous,
so remove them.

Cc: Frédéric Danis <frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c |   24 +++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
@@ -577,11 +577,9 @@ static int bcm_suspend_device(struct dev
 	}
 
 	/* Suspend the device */
-	if (bdev->device_wakeup) {
-		gpiod_set_value(bdev->device_wakeup, false);
-		bt_dev_dbg(bdev, "suspend, delaying 15 ms");
-		mdelay(15);
-	}
+	gpiod_set_value(bdev->device_wakeup, false);
+	bt_dev_dbg(bdev, "suspend, delaying 15 ms");
+	mdelay(15);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -592,11 +590,9 @@ static int bcm_resume_device(struct devi
 
 	bt_dev_dbg(bdev, "");
 
-	if (bdev->device_wakeup) {
-		gpiod_set_value(bdev->device_wakeup, true);
-		bt_dev_dbg(bdev, "resume, delaying 15 ms");
-		mdelay(15);
-	}
+	gpiod_set_value(bdev->device_wakeup, true);
+	bt_dev_dbg(bdev, "resume, delaying 15 ms");
+	mdelay(15);
 
 	/* When this executes, the device has woken up already */
 	if (bdev->is_suspended && bdev->hu) {
@@ -779,14 +775,12 @@ static int bcm_get_resources(struct bcm_
 
 	dev->clk = devm_clk_get(dev->dev, NULL);
 
-	dev->device_wakeup = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev->dev,
-						     "device-wakeup",
-						     GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	dev->device_wakeup = devm_gpiod_get(dev->dev, "device-wakeup",
+					    GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
 	if (IS_ERR(dev->device_wakeup))
 		return PTR_ERR(dev->device_wakeup);
 
-	dev->shutdown = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev->dev, "shutdown",
-						GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	dev->shutdown = devm_gpiod_get(dev->dev, "shutdown", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
 	if (IS_ERR(dev->shutdown))
 		return PTR_ERR(dev->shutdown);
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from lukas@wunner.de are

queue-4.15/bluetooth-hci_bcm-mandate-presence-of-shutdown-and-device-wake-gpio.patch
queue-4.15/bluetooth-hci_bcm-validate-irq-before-using-it.patch

             reply	other threads:[~2018-04-09  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-09  9:36 gregkh [this message]
2018-04-09 10:09 ` Patch "Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Mandate presence of shutdown and device wake GPIO" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree Lukas Wunner
2018-04-09 11:52   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152326656861254@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.