From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jacob.e.keller@intel.com, aaron.f.brown@intel.com,
alexander.levin@microsoft.com, davidm@metamako.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "igb: fix race condition with PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS bits" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 21:58:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523303898140240@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
igb: fix race condition with PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS bits
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
igb-fix-race-condition-with-ptp_tx_in_progress-bits.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Apr 9 17:09:24 CEST 2018
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 10:28:52 -0700
Subject: igb: fix race condition with PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS bits
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 4ccdc013b0ae04755a8f7905e0525955d52a77d0 ]
Hardware related to the igb driver has a limitation of only handling one
Tx timestamp at a time. Thus, the driver uses a state bit lock to
enforce that only one timestamp request is honored at a time.
Unfortunately this suffers from a simple race condition. The bit lock is
not cleared until after skb_tstamp_tx() is called notifying the stack of
a new Tx timestamp. Even a well behaved application which sends only one
timestamp request at once and waits for a response might wake up and
send a new packet before the bit lock is cleared. This results in
needlessly dropping some Tx timestamp requests.
We can fix this by unlocking the state bit as soon as we read the
Timestamp register, as this is the first point at which it is safe to
unlock.
To avoid issues with the skb pointer, we'll use a copy of the pointer
and set the global variable in the driver structure to NULL first. This
ensures that the next timestamp request does not modify our local copy
of the skb pointer.
This ensures that well behaved applications do not accidentally race
with the unlock bit. Obviously an application which sends multiple Tx
timestamp requests at once will still only timestamp one packet at
a time. Unfortunately there is nothing we can do about this.
Reported-by: David Mirabito <davidm@metamako.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
@@ -721,6 +721,7 @@ void igb_ptp_rx_hang(struct igb_adapter
**/
static void igb_ptp_tx_hwtstamp(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
{
+ struct sk_buff *skb = adapter->ptp_tx_skb;
struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
struct skb_shared_hwtstamps shhwtstamps;
u64 regval;
@@ -748,10 +749,17 @@ static void igb_ptp_tx_hwtstamp(struct i
shhwtstamps.hwtstamp =
ktime_add_ns(shhwtstamps.hwtstamp, adjust);
- skb_tstamp_tx(adapter->ptp_tx_skb, &shhwtstamps);
- dev_kfree_skb_any(adapter->ptp_tx_skb);
+ /* Clear the lock early before calling skb_tstamp_tx so that
+ * applications are not woken up before the lock bit is clear. We use
+ * a copy of the skb pointer to ensure other threads can't change it
+ * while we're notifying the stack.
+ */
adapter->ptp_tx_skb = NULL;
clear_bit_unlock(__IGB_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &adapter->state);
+
+ /* Notify the stack and free the skb after we've unlocked */
+ skb_tstamp_tx(skb, &shhwtstamps);
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
}
/**
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jacob.e.keller@intel.com are
queue-4.9/e1000e-fix-race-condition-around-skb_tstamp_tx.patch
queue-4.9/igb-fix-race-condition-with-ptp_tx_in_progress-bits.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-04-09 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1523303898140240@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=aaron.f.brown@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=davidm@metamako.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.