From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: bp@suse.de, arjan@linux.intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
bp@alien8.de, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functions" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:05:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523369115164129@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functions
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 3f1f576a195aa266813cbd4ca70291deb61e0129 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:26:38 +0100
Subject: x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functions
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
commit 3f1f576a195aa266813cbd4ca70291deb61e0129 upstream.
... so that callers can know when microcode was updated and act
accordingly.
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180216112640.11554-2-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 9 +++++++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 10 +++++-----
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 10 +++++-----
4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
@@ -37,7 +37,12 @@ struct cpu_signature {
struct device;
-enum ucode_state { UCODE_ERROR, UCODE_OK, UCODE_NFOUND };
+enum ucode_state {
+ UCODE_OK = 0,
+ UCODE_UPDATED,
+ UCODE_NFOUND,
+ UCODE_ERROR,
+};
struct microcode_ops {
enum ucode_state (*request_microcode_user) (int cpu,
@@ -54,7 +59,7 @@ struct microcode_ops {
* are being called.
* See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c.
*/
- int (*apply_microcode) (int cpu);
+ enum ucode_state (*apply_microcode) (int cpu);
int (*collect_cpu_info) (int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
};
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static unsigned int verify_patch_size(u8
return patch_size;
}
-static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
+static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
struct microcode_amd *mc_amd;
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
p = find_patch(cpu);
if (!p)
- return 0;
+ return UCODE_NFOUND;
mc_amd = p->data;
uci->mc = p->data;
@@ -523,13 +523,13 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
if (rev >= mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) {
c->microcode = rev;
uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
- return 0;
+ return UCODE_OK;
}
if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc_amd)) {
pr_err("CPU%d: update failed for patch_level=0x%08x\n",
cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
- return -1;
+ return UCODE_ERROR;
}
pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu,
mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
uci->cpu_sig.rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
c->microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
- return 0;
+ return UCODE_UPDATED;
}
static int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu)
}
struct apply_microcode_ctx {
- int err;
+ enum ucode_state err;
};
static void apply_microcode_local(void *arg)
@@ -489,31 +489,29 @@ static void __exit microcode_dev_exit(vo
/* fake device for request_firmware */
static struct platform_device *microcode_pdev;
-static int reload_for_cpu(int cpu)
+static enum ucode_state reload_for_cpu(int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
enum ucode_state ustate;
- int err = 0;
if (!uci->valid)
- return err;
+ return UCODE_OK;
ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, µcode_pdev->dev, true);
- if (ustate == UCODE_OK)
- apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
- else
- if (ustate == UCODE_ERROR)
- err = -EINVAL;
- return err;
+ if (ustate != UCODE_OK)
+ return ustate;
+
+ return apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
}
static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t size)
{
+ enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK;
unsigned long val;
+ ssize_t ret = 0;
int cpu;
- ssize_t ret = 0, tmp_ret;
ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
if (ret)
@@ -526,15 +524,18 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct devic
mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
tmp_ret = reload_for_cpu(cpu);
- if (tmp_ret != 0)
+ if (tmp_ret > UCODE_NFOUND) {
pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu);
- /* save retval of the first encountered reload error */
- if (!ret)
- ret = tmp_ret;
+ /* set retval for the first encountered reload error */
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ }
}
- if (!ret)
+
+ if (!ret && tmp_ret == UCODE_UPDATED)
perf_check_microcode();
+
mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
put_online_cpus();
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num,
return 0;
}
-static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
+static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
{
struct microcode_intel *mc;
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu
/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu))
- return -1;
+ return UCODE_ERROR;
uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
mc = uci->mc;
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu
/* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */
mc = find_patch(uci);
if (!mc)
- return 0;
+ return UCODE_NFOUND;
}
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu
if (rev != mc->hdr.rev) {
pr_err("CPU%d update to revision 0x%x failed\n",
cpu, mc->hdr.rev);
- return -1;
+ return UCODE_ERROR;
}
if (rev != prev_rev) {
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu
uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
c->microcode = rev;
- return 0;
+ return UCODE_UPDATED;
}
static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bp@suse.de are
queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-check-microcode-revision-before-updating-sibling-threads.patch
queue-4.14/x86-microcode-attempt-late-loading-only-when-new-microcode-is-present.patch
queue-4.14/x86-microcode-propagate-return-value-from-updating-functions.patch
queue-4.14/x86-cpu-check-cpu-feature-bits-after-microcode-upgrade.patch
queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-writeback-and-invalidate-caches-before-updating-microcode.patch
queue-4.14/x86-microcode-intel-look-into-the-patch-cache-first.patch
queue-4.14/edac-mv64x60-fix-an-error-handling-path.patch
queue-4.14/x86-microcode-request-microcode-on-the-bsp.patch
queue-4.14/x86-microcode-get-rid-of-struct-apply_microcode_ctx.patch
queue-4.14/x86-microcode-fix-cpu-synchronization-routine.patch
queue-4.14/x86-microcode-synchronize-late-microcode-loading.patch
queue-4.14/x86-microcode-do-not-upload-microcode-if-cpus-are-offline.patch
queue-4.14/x86-cpu-add-a-microcode-loader-callback.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-04-10 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1523369115164129@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.