From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: decui@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, jackm@mellanox.com,
kys@microsoft.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
mikelley@microsoft.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
sthemmin@microsoft.com, v-adsuho@microsoft.com,
v-chvale@microsoft.com, vkuznets@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] PCI: hv: Serialize the present and eject work items" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:15:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152387370611370@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 021ad274d7dc31611d4f47f7dd4ac7a224526f30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:20:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Serialize the present and eject work items
When we hot-remove the device, we first receive a PCI_EJECT message and
then receive a PCI_BUS_RELATIONS message with bus_rel->device_count == 0.
The first message is offloaded to hv_eject_device_work(), and the second
is offloaded to pci_devices_present_work(). Both the paths can be running
list_del(&hpdev->list_entry), causing general protection fault, because
system_wq can run them concurrently.
The patch eliminates the race condition.
Since access to present/eject work items is serialized, we do not need the
hbus->enum_sem anymore, so remove it.
Fixes: 4daace0d8ce8 ("PCI: hv: Add paravirtual PCI front-end for Microsoft Hyper-V VMs")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/KL1P15301MB00064DA6B4D221123B5241CFBFD70@KL1P15301MB0006.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Tested-by: Adrian Suhov <v-adsuho@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Chris Valean <v-chvale@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
[lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com: squashed semaphore removal patch]
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.6+
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@mellanox.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
index 2faf38eab785..b7fd5c157d73 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ struct hv_pcibus_device {
spinlock_t device_list_lock; /* Protect lists below */
void __iomem *cfg_addr;
- struct semaphore enum_sem;
struct list_head resources_for_children;
struct list_head children;
@@ -461,6 +460,8 @@ struct hv_pcibus_device {
struct retarget_msi_interrupt retarget_msi_interrupt_params;
spinlock_t retarget_msi_interrupt_lock;
+
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq;
};
/*
@@ -1590,12 +1591,8 @@ static struct hv_pci_dev *get_pcichild_wslot(struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus,
* It must also treat the omission of a previously observed device as
* notification that the device no longer exists.
*
- * Note that this function is a work item, and it may not be
- * invoked in the order that it was queued. Back to back
- * updates of the list of present devices may involve queuing
- * multiple work items, and this one may run before ones that
- * were sent later. As such, this function only does something
- * if is the last one in the queue.
+ * Note that this function is serialized with hv_eject_device_work(),
+ * because both are pushed to the ordered workqueue hbus->wq.
*/
static void pci_devices_present_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
@@ -1616,11 +1613,6 @@ static void pci_devices_present_work(struct work_struct *work)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&removed);
- if (down_interruptible(&hbus->enum_sem)) {
- put_hvpcibus(hbus);
- return;
- }
-
/* Pull this off the queue and process it if it was the last one. */
spin_lock_irqsave(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
while (!list_empty(&hbus->dr_list)) {
@@ -1637,7 +1629,6 @@ static void pci_devices_present_work(struct work_struct *work)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
if (!dr) {
- up(&hbus->enum_sem);
put_hvpcibus(hbus);
return;
}
@@ -1724,7 +1715,6 @@ static void pci_devices_present_work(struct work_struct *work)
break;
}
- up(&hbus->enum_sem);
put_hvpcibus(hbus);
kfree(dr);
}
@@ -1770,7 +1760,7 @@ static void hv_pci_devices_present(struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
get_hvpcibus(hbus);
- schedule_work(&dr_wrk->wrk);
+ queue_work(hbus->wq, &dr_wrk->wrk);
}
/**
@@ -1848,7 +1838,7 @@ static void hv_pci_eject_device(struct hv_pci_dev *hpdev)
get_pcichild(hpdev, hv_pcidev_ref_pnp);
INIT_WORK(&hpdev->wrk, hv_eject_device_work);
get_hvpcibus(hpdev->hbus);
- schedule_work(&hpdev->wrk);
+ queue_work(hpdev->hbus->wq, &hpdev->wrk);
}
/**
@@ -2461,13 +2451,18 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
spin_lock_init(&hbus->config_lock);
spin_lock_init(&hbus->device_list_lock);
spin_lock_init(&hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_lock);
- sema_init(&hbus->enum_sem, 1);
init_completion(&hbus->remove_event);
+ hbus->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("hv_pci_%x", 0,
+ hbus->sysdata.domain);
+ if (!hbus->wq) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto free_bus;
+ }
ret = vmbus_open(hdev->channel, pci_ring_size, pci_ring_size, NULL, 0,
hv_pci_onchannelcallback, hbus);
if (ret)
- goto free_bus;
+ goto destroy_wq;
hv_set_drvdata(hdev, hbus);
@@ -2536,6 +2531,8 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
hv_free_config_window(hbus);
close:
vmbus_close(hdev->channel);
+destroy_wq:
+ destroy_workqueue(hbus->wq);
free_bus:
free_page((unsigned long)hbus);
return ret;
@@ -2615,6 +2612,7 @@ static int hv_pci_remove(struct hv_device *hdev)
irq_domain_free_fwnode(hbus->sysdata.fwnode);
put_hvpcibus(hbus);
wait_for_completion(&hbus->remove_event);
+ destroy_workqueue(hbus->wq);
free_page((unsigned long)hbus);
return 0;
}
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-16 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-16 10:15 gregkh [this message]
2018-04-16 13:22 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] PCI: hv: Serialize the present and eject work items" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-04-17 2:06 ` Dexuan Cui
2018-04-22 9:45 ` gregkh
2018-04-22 13:49 ` Dexuan Cui
2018-04-22 14:02 ` gregkh
2018-04-23 5:11 ` Dexuan Cui
2018-04-23 23:43 ` Dexuan Cui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152387370611370@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=jackm@mellanox.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=v-adsuho@microsoft.com \
--cc=v-chvale@microsoft.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.