From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Cc: linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EVM: Allow runtime modification of the set of verified xattrs
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:16:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523909802.3272.238.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACdnJutNLdkqaz0UfveSq_vYBZ37Qx8DkfGWKR3_=bcLpj5MwA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 18:32 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 7:05 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Although evm_config_xattrnames is not currently defined as a const, it
> > should have been. Including additional xattrs via a securityfs file,
> > limits how the memory for the entire list of xattrs and the pointer to
> > that list can be protected.
>
> Right, I did wonder about that.
>
> > Does this extra list of xattrs need to be run time or build time
> > configurable? If it's build time configurable you'd be able to use
> > __ro_after_init. For run time configurable, perhaps the proposed
> > "post-init read-only memory" (https://lwn.net/Articles/750215/) could
> > be used.
>
> Runtime. I'll look into the post-init stuff, but given that this doesn't
> change the current security position do you think it's a blocker?
I would probably make the existing evm_config_xattrnames a const and
create a link list. As new xattrs are defined, append them to the
tail.
Is there a reason for adding one additional xattrs one at a time, as
opposed to parsing a string?
Is it better to define a securityfs file, rather than a boot command
line argument? With a boot command line argument, the list of xattrs
could be defined as __ro_after_init.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-16 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-13 22:52 [PATCH] EVM: Allow runtime modification of the set of verified xattrs Matthew Garrett
2018-04-15 14:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-04-16 18:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-04-16 20:16 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2018-04-16 20:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-04-24 20:03 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-04-25 14:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-04-25 16:54 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1523909802.3272.238.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.