diff for duplicates of <1524753932.3226.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 4a1e58b..9f46e26 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 10:28 -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Wed 25-04-18 18:42:57, Mikulas Patocka wrote: -> > > -> > > +> > >A +> > >A > > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, James Bottomley wrote: > > [...] > > > > Kconfig proliferation, conversely, is a bit of a nightmare from @@ -12,17 +12,17 @@ On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 10:28 -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > > the user and the tester's point of view, so we're trying to > avoid it > > > > unless absolutely necessary. -> > > > +> > > >A > > > > James -> > > +> > >A > > > I already offered that we don't need to introduce a new kernel -> option and +> option andA > > > we can bind this feature to any other kernel option, that is -> enabled in +> enabled inA > > > the debug kernel, for example CONFIG_DEBUG_SG. Michal said no and -> he said +> he saidA > > > that he wants a new kernel option instead. -> > +> >A > > Just for the record. I didn't say I _want_ a config option. Do not > > misinterpret my words. I've said that a config option would be > > acceptable if there is no way to deliver the functionality via @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 10:28 -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > some but I do not see them right now. > > AFAIK Grub doesn't load per-kernel options from a per-kernel file. -> Even if we hacked grub scripts to add this option, other +> Even ifA we hacked grub scripts to add this option, other > distributions won't. Perhaps find out beforehand instead of insisting on an approach without diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 0aa191f..107728b 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ "> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:\n" "> \n" "> > On Wed 25-04-18 18:42:57, Mikulas Patocka wrote:\n" - "> > >\302\240\n" - "> > >\302\240\n" + "> > >A \n" + "> > >A \n" "> > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, James Bottomley wrote:\n" "> > [...]\n" "> > > > Kconfig proliferation, conversely, is a bit of a nightmare from\n" @@ -46,17 +46,17 @@ "> > > > the user and the tester's point of view, so we're trying to\n" "> avoid it\n" "> > > > unless absolutely necessary.\n" - "> > > >\302\240\n" + "> > > >A \n" "> > > > James\n" - "> > >\302\240\n" + "> > >A \n" "> > > I already offered that we don't need to introduce a new kernel\n" - "> option and\302\240\n" + "> option andA \n" "> > > we can bind this feature to any other kernel option, that is\n" - "> enabled in\302\240\n" + "> enabled inA \n" "> > > the debug kernel, for example CONFIG_DEBUG_SG. Michal said no and\n" - "> he said\302\240\n" + "> he saidA \n" "> > > that he wants a new kernel option instead.\n" - "> >\302\240\n" + "> >A \n" "> > Just for the record. I didn't say I _want_ a config option. Do not\n" "> > misinterpret my words. I've said that a config option would be\n" "> > acceptable if there is no way to deliver the functionality via\n" @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ "> > some but I do not see them right now.\n" "> \n" "> AFAIK Grub doesn't load per-kernel options from a per-kernel file.\n" - "> Even if\302\240we hacked grub scripts to add this option, other\n" + "> Even ifA we hacked grub scripts to add this option, other\n" "> distributions won't.\n" "\n" "Perhaps find out beforehand instead of insisting on an approach without\n" @@ -80,4 +80,4 @@ "\n" James -f8c51770a1d15ad2aa82ae1ec7344c678f84cb5d6085df50d943d29864445031 +2fab3d571a254aa14f6c0fa343fdc6b12c635f131cd377caa2ead08ff82259cd
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.