From: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"don.brace@microsemi.com" <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
"james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com"
<james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"osandov@fb.com" <osandov@fb.com>,
"kashyap.desai@broadcom.com" <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: scsi-mq: don't hold host_busy in IO path
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:55:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524844550.30534.1.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <647b4fe833fdf001f724cfa0803c9e3a79d78b13.camel@wdc.com>
On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 15:48 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 09:39 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&shost->tag_set, scsi_host_check_in_flight,
> > &in_flight);
> > return in_flight.cnt + atomic_read(&shost->host_busy);
> >
> > The atomic read is basically free, once we get rid of the dirty of
> > that
> > variable on each IO.
>
> Hello Jens,
>
> What makes you think that " + atomic_read(&shost->host_busy)" is
> necessary?
> I am not aware of any code outside the SCSI core that modifies the
> host_busy
> member.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
>
>
As part of testing latest upstream in MQ and non-MQ I intend to test
this patch series fully on actual hardware
F/C 8G to memory backed array LUNS and of course SRP/RDMA
I have started working on this and will report back.
Thanks
Laurence
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-27 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-20 6:57 [PATCH 0/3] scsi: scsi-mq: don't hold host_busy in IO path Ming Lei
2018-04-20 6:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: introduce scsi_host_busy() Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-20 6:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: read host_busy via scsi_host_busy() Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-28 8:17 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-20 6:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: avoid to hold host-wide counter of host_busy for scsi_mq Ming Lei
2018-04-27 16:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-28 8:26 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] scsi: scsi-mq: don't hold host_busy in IO path Bart Van Assche
2018-04-27 15:39 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-27 15:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-27 15:55 ` Laurence Oberman [this message]
2018-04-27 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-28 8:47 ` Ming Lei
2018-06-22 15:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-06-22 21:43 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524844550.30534.1.camel@redhat.com \
--to=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.