All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] vsprintf: Replace memory barrier with static_key for" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 15:05:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152673511417591@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From 85f4f12d51397f1648e1f4350f77e24039b82d61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 22:24:52 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] vsprintf: Replace memory barrier with static_key for
 random_ptr_key update

Reviewing Tobin's patches for getting pointers out early before
entropy has been established, I noticed that there's a lone smp_mb() in
the code. As with most lone memory barriers, this one appears to be
incorrectly used.

We currently basically have this:

	get_random_bytes(&ptr_key, sizeof(ptr_key));
	/*
	 * have_filled_random_ptr_key==true is dependent on get_random_bytes().
	 * ptr_to_id() needs to see have_filled_random_ptr_key==true
	 * after get_random_bytes() returns.
	 */
	smp_mb();
	WRITE_ONCE(have_filled_random_ptr_key, true);

And later we have:

	if (unlikely(!have_filled_random_ptr_key))
		return string(buf, end, "(ptrval)", spec);

/* Missing memory barrier here. */

	hashval = (unsigned long)siphash_1u64((u64)ptr, &ptr_key);

As the CPU can perform speculative loads, we could have a situation
with the following:

	CPU0				CPU1
	----				----
				   load ptr_key = 0
   store ptr_key = random
   smp_mb()
   store have_filled_random_ptr_key

				   load have_filled_random_ptr_key = true

				    BAD BAD BAD! (you're so bad!)

Because nothing prevents CPU1 from loading ptr_key before loading
have_filled_random_ptr_key.

But this race is very unlikely, but we can't keep an incorrect smp_mb() in
place. Instead, replace the have_filled_random_ptr_key with a static_branch
not_filled_random_ptr_key, that is initialized to true and changed to false
when we get enough entropy. If the update happens in early boot, the
static_key is updated immediately, otherwise it will have to wait till
entropy is filled and this happens in an interrupt handler which can't
enable a static_key, as that requires a preemptible context. In that case, a
work_queue is used to enable it, as entropy already took too long to
establish in the first place waiting a little more shouldn't hurt anything.

The benefit of using the static key is that the unlikely branch in
vsprintf() now becomes a nop.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180515100558.21df515e@gandalf.local.home

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: ad67b74d2469d ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 30c0cb8cc9bc..23920c5ff728 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -1669,19 +1669,22 @@ char *pointer_string(char *buf, char *end, const void *ptr,
 	return number(buf, end, (unsigned long int)ptr, spec);
 }
 
-static bool have_filled_random_ptr_key __read_mostly;
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(not_filled_random_ptr_key);
 static siphash_key_t ptr_key __read_mostly;
 
-static void fill_random_ptr_key(struct random_ready_callback *unused)
+static void enable_ptr_key_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	get_random_bytes(&ptr_key, sizeof(ptr_key));
-	/*
-	 * have_filled_random_ptr_key==true is dependent on get_random_bytes().
-	 * ptr_to_id() needs to see have_filled_random_ptr_key==true
-	 * after get_random_bytes() returns.
-	 */
-	smp_mb();
-	WRITE_ONCE(have_filled_random_ptr_key, true);
+	/* Needs to run from preemptible context */
+	static_branch_disable(&not_filled_random_ptr_key);
+}
+
+static DECLARE_WORK(enable_ptr_key_work, enable_ptr_key_workfn);
+
+static void fill_random_ptr_key(struct random_ready_callback *unused)
+{
+	/* This may be in an interrupt handler. */
+	queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &enable_ptr_key_work);
 }
 
 static struct random_ready_callback random_ready = {
@@ -1695,7 +1698,8 @@ static int __init initialize_ptr_random(void)
 	if (!ret) {
 		return 0;
 	} else if (ret == -EALREADY) {
-		fill_random_ptr_key(&random_ready);
+		/* This is in preemptible context */
+		enable_ptr_key_workfn(&enable_ptr_key_work);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -1709,7 +1713,7 @@ static char *ptr_to_id(char *buf, char *end, void *ptr, struct printf_spec spec)
 	unsigned long hashval;
 	const int default_width = 2 * sizeof(ptr);
 
-	if (unlikely(!have_filled_random_ptr_key)) {
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&not_filled_random_ptr_key)) {
 		spec.field_width = default_width;
 		/* string length must be less than default_width */
 		return string(buf, end, "(ptrval)", spec);

             reply	other threads:[~2018-05-19 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-19 13:05 gregkh [this message]
2018-05-19 13:13 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] vsprintf: Replace memory barrier with static_key for" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152673511417591@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.