From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] s390/kernel: use expoline for indirect branches" failed to apply to 4.16-stable tree
Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 18:53:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15268352111640@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.16-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From c50c84c3ac4d5db683904bdb3257798b6ef980ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:41:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] s390/kernel: use expoline for indirect branches
The assember code in arch/s390/kernel uses a few more indirect branches
which need to be done with execute trampolines for CONFIG_EXPOLINE=y.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16
Fixes: f19fbd5ed6 ("s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches")
Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/base.S b/arch/s390/kernel/base.S
index f6c56009e822..b65874b0b412 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/base.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/base.S
@@ -9,18 +9,22 @@
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/nospec-insn.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/sigp.h>
+ GEN_BR_THUNK %r9
+ GEN_BR_THUNK %r14
+
ENTRY(s390_base_mcck_handler)
basr %r13,0
0: lg %r15,__LC_PANIC_STACK # load panic stack
aghi %r15,-STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
larl %r1,s390_base_mcck_handler_fn
- lg %r1,0(%r1)
- ltgr %r1,%r1
+ lg %r9,0(%r1)
+ ltgr %r9,%r9
jz 1f
- basr %r14,%r1
+ BASR_EX %r14,%r9
1: la %r1,4095
lmg %r0,%r15,__LC_GPREGS_SAVE_AREA-4095(%r1)
lpswe __LC_MCK_OLD_PSW
@@ -37,10 +41,10 @@ ENTRY(s390_base_ext_handler)
basr %r13,0
0: aghi %r15,-STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
larl %r1,s390_base_ext_handler_fn
- lg %r1,0(%r1)
- ltgr %r1,%r1
+ lg %r9,0(%r1)
+ ltgr %r9,%r9
jz 1f
- basr %r14,%r1
+ BASR_EX %r14,%r9
1: lmg %r0,%r15,__LC_SAVE_AREA_ASYNC
ni __LC_EXT_OLD_PSW+1,0xfd # clear wait state bit
lpswe __LC_EXT_OLD_PSW
@@ -57,10 +61,10 @@ ENTRY(s390_base_pgm_handler)
basr %r13,0
0: aghi %r15,-STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
larl %r1,s390_base_pgm_handler_fn
- lg %r1,0(%r1)
- ltgr %r1,%r1
+ lg %r9,0(%r1)
+ ltgr %r9,%r9
jz 1f
- basr %r14,%r1
+ BASR_EX %r14,%r9
lmg %r0,%r15,__LC_SAVE_AREA_SYNC
lpswe __LC_PGM_OLD_PSW
1: lpswe disabled_wait_psw-0b(%r13)
@@ -117,7 +121,7 @@ ENTRY(diag308_reset)
larl %r4,.Lcontinue_psw # Restore PSW flags
lpswe 0(%r4)
.Lcontinue:
- br %r14
+ BR_EX %r14
.align 16
.Lrestart_psw:
.long 0x00080000,0x80000000 + .Lrestart_part2
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/reipl.S b/arch/s390/kernel/reipl.S
index 73cc3750f0d3..7f14adf512c6 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/reipl.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/reipl.S
@@ -7,8 +7,11 @@
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/nospec-insn.h>
#include <asm/sigp.h>
+ GEN_BR_THUNK %r9
+
#
# Issue "store status" for the current CPU to its prefix page
# and call passed function afterwards
@@ -67,9 +70,9 @@ ENTRY(store_status)
st %r4,0(%r1)
st %r5,4(%r1)
stg %r2,8(%r1)
- lgr %r1,%r2
+ lgr %r9,%r2
lgr %r2,%r3
- br %r1
+ BR_EX %r9
.section .bss
.align 8
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/swsusp.S b/arch/s390/kernel/swsusp.S
index e99187149f17..a049a7b9d6e8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/swsusp.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/swsusp.S
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/thread_info.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/nospec-insn.h>
#include <asm/sigp.h>
/*
@@ -24,6 +25,8 @@
* (see below) in the resume process.
* This function runs with disabled interrupts.
*/
+ GEN_BR_THUNK %r14
+
.section .text
ENTRY(swsusp_arch_suspend)
stmg %r6,%r15,__SF_GPRS(%r15)
@@ -103,7 +106,7 @@ ENTRY(swsusp_arch_suspend)
spx 0x318(%r1)
lmg %r6,%r15,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD + __SF_GPRS(%r15)
lghi %r2,0
- br %r14
+ BR_EX %r14
/*
* Restore saved memory image to correct place and restore register context.
@@ -197,11 +200,10 @@ pgm_check_entry:
larl %r15,init_thread_union
ahi %r15,1<<(PAGE_SHIFT+THREAD_SIZE_ORDER)
larl %r2,.Lpanic_string
- larl %r3,sclp_early_printk
lghi %r1,0
sam31
sigp %r1,%r0,SIGP_SET_ARCHITECTURE
- basr %r14,%r3
+ brasl %r14,sclp_early_printk
larl %r3,.Ldisabled_wait_31
lpsw 0(%r3)
4:
@@ -267,7 +269,7 @@ restore_registers:
/* Return 0 */
lmg %r6,%r15,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD + __SF_GPRS(%r15)
lghi %r2,0
- br %r14
+ BR_EX %r14
.section .data..nosave,"aw",@progbits
.align 8
reply other threads:[~2018-05-20 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15268352111640@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.