All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: vathsala nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:58:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1527019137.2226.12.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526979431-716-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>

On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 14:27 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> From: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
> 
> Prints live state of psr1.Extending the existing
> PSR2 live state function to cover psr1.
> 
> Tested on KBL with psr2 and psr1 panel.
> 
> v2: rebase
> v3: DK
>     Rename psr2_live_status to psr_source_status
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> ------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h     |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 5251544..e4a2f15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2596,25 +2596,42 @@ static int i915_guc_log_relay_release(struct
> inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	.release = i915_guc_log_relay_release,
>  };
>  
> -static const char *psr2_live_status(u32 val)
> -{
> -	static const char * const live_status[] = {
> -		"IDLE",
> -		"CAPTURE",
> -		"CAPTURE_FS",
> -		"SLEEP",
> -		"BUFON_FW",
> -		"ML_UP",
> -		"SU_STANDBY",
> -		"FAST_SLEEP",
> -		"DEEP_SLEEP",
> -		"BUF_ON",
> -		"TG_ON"
> -	};
> -
> -	val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> -	if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> -		return live_status[val];
> +static const char *psr_source_status(u32 val, bool is_psr2_enabled)
Please change this to psr_source_status(drm_i915_private *dev_priv)

> +{
> +	if (is_psr2_enabled) {
> +		static const char * const live_status[] = {
> +			"IDLE",
> +			"CAPTURE",
> +			"CAPTURE_FS",
> +			"SLEEP",
> +			"BUFON_FW",
> +			"ML_UP",
> +			"SU_STANDBY",
> +			"FAST_SLEEP",
> +			"DEEP_SLEEP",
> +			"BUF_ON",
> +			"TG_ON"
> +		};
With that, you can		
		live_status = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS);
> +		val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> +			EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> +		if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> +			return live_status[val];
> +	} else {
> +		static const char * const live_status[] = {
> +			"IDLE",
> +			"SRDONACK",
> +			"SRDENT",
> +			"BUFOFF",
> +			"BUFON",
> +			"AUXACK",
> +			"SRDOFFACK",
> +			"SRDENT_ON",
> +		};

		live_status = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_STATUS);
> +		val = (val & EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> +			EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> +		if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> +			return live_status[val];
> +	}
>  
>  	return "unknown";
>  }
> @@ -2647,6 +2664,7 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file
> *m, void *data)
>  	enum pipe pipe;
>  	bool enabled = false;
>  	bool sink_support;
> +	u32 psr_status;
>  
>  	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -2714,12 +2732,12 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct
> seq_file *m, void *data)
>  
>  		seq_printf(m, "Performance_Counter: %u\n", psrperf);
>  	}
> -	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> -		u32 psr2 = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS);
>  
> -		seq_printf(m, "EDP_PSR2_STATUS: %x [%s]\n",
> -			   psr2, psr2_live_status(psr2));
> -	}
> +	psr_status = (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) ?
> I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS) :
> +						    I915_READ(EDP_PS
> R_STATUS);

Please move this inside psr_source_status(), I don't see a point in
checking for psr2_enabled here and again in psr_source_status()



> +	seq_printf(m, "SOURCE_PSR_STATUS: %x[%s]\n",
It's easier on the eyes if these strings are consistent, there is no
benefit in writing only this string differently.

Sink status is printed as "Sink PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n". Please do the
same by writing this as "Source PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n"
 
> +		     psr_status,
> +		     psr_source_status(psr_status, dev_priv-
> >psr.psr2_enabled));
>  
>  	if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
>  		struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &dev_priv->psr.enabled-
> >aux;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 513b4a4..3c42021 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4069,6 +4069,7 @@ enum {
>  #define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_SENDING_TP2_TP3	(1<<8)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_SENDING_TP1		(1<<4)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_IDLE_MASK		0xf
> +#define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT		29

You ignored my review from last time, please move this where the mask
'EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK' is defined. The rest of the file maintains
this consistently and there is no reason to change that.



_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-22 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-22  8:57 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status vathsala nagaraju
2018-05-22 10:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status (rev3) Patchwork
2018-05-22 10:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-22 13:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-05-22 19:58 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-05-23  5:37   ` [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : Add psr1 live status Nagaraju, Vathsala
2018-05-23 17:41     ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-27  8:08 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: " vathsala nagaraju
2018-07-02 18:38 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-22  3:59 vathsala nagaraju
2018-06-22 18:51 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-21  8:06 vathsala nagaraju
2018-06-21  9:01 ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-25  6:20 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr : " vathsala nagaraju
2018-06-12 23:29 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-19 15:03   ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-25  5:37 vathsala nagaraju
2018-04-27  6:24 vathsala nagaraju
2018-05-10  2:02 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-04-20  9:36 vathsala nagaraju
2018-04-20 17:14 ` Souza, Jose
2018-04-25  0:56   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-04-27  5:58     ` vathsala nagaraju
2018-04-20 17:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-21  4:00   ` Nagaraju, Vathsala
2018-04-23  8:00     ` vathsala nagaraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1527019137.2226.12.camel@intel.com \
    --to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.