From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "usb: gadget: function: printer: avoid wrong list handling in" added to usb-next
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 19:14:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152718205414086@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
usb: gadget: function: printer: avoid wrong list handling in
to my usb git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git
in the usb-next branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will also be merged in the next major kernel release
during the merge window.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
>From 4a014a7339f441b0851ce012f469c0fadac61c81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 20:18:07 +0900
Subject: usb: gadget: function: printer: avoid wrong list handling in
printer_write()
When printer_write() calls usb_ep_queue(), a udc driver (e.g.
renesas_usbhs driver) may call usb_gadget_giveback_request() in
the udc .queue ops immediately. Then, printer_write() calls
list_add(&req->list, &dev->tx_reqs_active) wrongly. After that,
if we do unbind the printer driver, WARN_ON() happens in
printer_func_unbind() because the list entry is not removed.
So, this patch moves list_add(&req->list, &dev->tx_reqs_active)
calling before usb_ep_queue().
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
index d359efe06c76..9c7ed2539ff7 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
@@ -631,19 +631,19 @@ printer_write(struct file *fd, const char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
return -EAGAIN;
}
+ list_add(&req->list, &dev->tx_reqs_active);
+
/* here, we unlock, and only unlock, to avoid deadlock. */
spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
value = usb_ep_queue(dev->in_ep, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
spin_lock(&dev->lock);
if (value) {
+ list_del(&req->list);
list_add(&req->list, &dev->tx_reqs);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
mutex_unlock(&dev->lock_printer_io);
return -EAGAIN;
}
-
- list_add(&req->list, &dev->tx_reqs_active);
-
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
--
2.17.0
reply other threads:[~2018-05-24 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152718205414086@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.